South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Sugar and Spice Child Development Center and Kindergarten, (4070128) vs. SCDHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Sugar and Spice Child Development Center and Kindergarten, (4070128)

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
99-ALJ-07-0327-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WHEREAS, the Respondent, the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, (DHEC or the Department) is an agency of the State of South Carolina vested with all the powers, functions, and duties granted to the Department and its officers and agents by statute, the Department is charged with implementation of the State Drinking Water Act, S.C. Code Ann. 44-55-10, (1976, as amended) and regulations promulgated thereunder: S. C. Code Ann Regs. 61-58.11; S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 61-58.6 (E), (1976, as amended); S.C. Code Ann. 44-55-40 (h) and 44-55-80; and R. 61-58 of the State Primary Drinking Water Regulations and R. 61-71 of Well Standards; and

WHEREAS, the Petitioner, Sugar and Spice Child Development Center and Kindergarten, is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the public water system, permit number 40-70128, (the PWS) which serves Sugar and Spice Child Development Center in Richland County, South Carolina; and

WHEREAS, the Department alleges that Petitioner violated the Safe Drinking Water Act, S.C. Code Ann. 44-55-10, (1976, as amended) and regulations promulgated thereunder in that the Petitioner failed to monitor its PWS for lead and copper for the January through June 1997 monitoring period, the July through December 1997 monitoring period, and the January through June 1998 monitoring period; failed to issue public notice in a local daily newspaper of the lead and copper non-monitoring violations within thirty days of its receipt of the Notice of Violations; and due to such violations subjected itself to the assessment of civil penalties as authorized by S.C. Code Ann. 44-55-90, (1976, as amended), State Safe Drinking Water Act; and

WHEREAS, the Department issued Administrative Order 99-72-DW to Petitioner on June 9, 1999, stating that within fifteen (15) days of the Order, that the Petitioners shall issue public notice of non-monitoring violations by placing an ad in a local daily newspaper and submit a copy of the public notice, along with an affidavit from the newspaper, to the Department, and that within thirty (30) days of the Order, the Petitioner shall pay to the Department a civil penalty in the amount of eight-thousand eight-hundred twenty-five ($8825.00) dollars; and

WHEREAS, the Petitioner appealed Administrative Order 99-72-DW, stating that it had taken all possible steps to comply with the State Safe Drinking Water Act, and had attempted to cooperate to the best of its ability with the Department's efforts to ensure such compliance, and that payment of the fine, as sought by the Department, was a financial impossibility for the Petitioner at the present time; and

WHEREAS, subsequent submission of documentation by the Petitioner, as required by the Order, and submission by the Petitioner of proof of its inability to pay a penalty of more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), has been received by the Department; and

WHEREAS, the Department, after review of the Petitioner's proof of compliance and the evidence of inability to pay, consents to a reduction of the penalty to one thousand dollars ($1,000.00); and

WHEREAS, the Petitioner also consents to dismissal of the appeal; and

WHEREAS, the parties to this action have reached an agreement as outlined below that will dispose of this case without further proceedings;

NOW THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED AND AGREED that the Petitioner shall pay a reduced penalty in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), in ten (10) monthly installments, pursuant to its agreement with the Department.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND AGREED that the issues underlying Administrative Order 99-72-DW are resolved and this contested case proceeding is hereby dismissed.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.





________________________________________ April 10, 2000

The Honorable Ralph King Anderson Date

Administrative Law Judge





WE CONSENT.





_________________________________________

Carol Raines, Sugar and Spice Date

Child Development Center









_________________________________________

Jackie Raines, Sugar and Spice Date

Child Development Center









________________________________________

Samuel L. Finklea, III Date

Chief Counsel for EQC

Attorney for Respondent



C:\alj\15\990327.wpd


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court