South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Wanda Bailey Smith vs. SCDHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Wanda Bailey Smith

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
99-ALJ-107-0064-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to my order dated February 4, 1999, each party in this contested case was required to file a prehearing statement with the Administrative Law Judge Division and to serve the same on all parties within fifteen (l 5) days of the date of the order. The Notice of Hearing ("Notice") and Order for Prehearing Statements ("Order") were sent to the Respondent by way of certified mail. On February 23, 1999, the Division sent a letter along with the Notice and Order to the Respondent by way of certified and regular U.S. mail granting her an additional ten (10) days to respond to the Order. The Respondent did not respond to the letter requesting the filing of a prehearing statement by March 5, 1999. Pursuant to ALJD Rule 23, this matter is hereby dismissed. This Rule provides:

The administrative law judge may dismiss a contested case or dispose of a contested case adverse to the defaulting party. A default occurs when a party fails to respond or otherwise prosecute or defend, fails to appear at a hearing without the proper consent of the judge or fails to comply with any interlocutory order of the administrative law judge. Any non-defaulting party may move for an order dismissing the case or terminating it adversely to the defaulting party.



ALJD Rule 23 (1997) (emphasis added).

By virtue of Respondent's request for a contested case, she has an obligation to defend her position. Respondent has not requested an extension or enlargement of time pursuant to ALJD Rule 3B to comply with this Division's order, but rather has been unresponsive to all communications. Respondent has been given abundant opportunity to comply. "There is a limit beyond which the



court should not allow a litigant to consume the time of the court . . . ." Georganne Apparel, Inc. v. Todd, 303 S.C. 87, 92, 399 S.E.2d 16, 19 (Ct. App. 1990).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.





________________________________

Ralph K. Anderson, III

Administrative Law Judge



March 11, 1999

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court