South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Townsend Terrace Retirement Home vs. DHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Townsend Terrace Retirement Home

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
04-ALJ-07-0076-CC

APPEARANCES:
Dennis L. Gibbs, Director
Division of Health Licensing

Nancy S. Layman
Attorney for Health Regulation

Mary Frances Shaw, Licensee
Townsend Terrace Retirement Home
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT



1.Mary Frances Shaw is the holder of a license to operate Townsend Terrace

Retirement Home (Facility) issued by the South Carolina Department of Health and

Environmental Control (Department) pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 44-7-110 et seq.

(2002). The Facility, located in Bishopville, South Carolina, has a licensed capacity

of 10 (ten ) beds.

2.The Department notified the Facility by letter dated January 22, 2004, that it

was imposing a $26,450 monetary penalty for violations and repeat violations of S.C.

Code Ann. Regs. 61-84, Standards for Licensing Community Residential Care

Facilities (Supp. 2002). The letter advised that the Department’s determination

would become final thirty (30) days from the date of the letter unless during such

thirty- (30) day period a written letter of appeal requesting a contested case hearing

under S.C. Code Ann. § 44-7-320(B) (2002) and Rules of Procedure for the

Administrative Law Judge Division was submitted.

3.By undated letter received by the Department’s Clerk of the Board on

February 20, 2004, the facility submitted a timely request for a contested case

hearing.

4.Prior to proceeding to an administrative hearing, the parties met on

March 31, 2004. The Facility stated that it had corrected the violations and initiated

action to ensure that the violations were not repeated. The Facility and the

Department reached agreement to resolve this matter.

THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED

1.The Licensee will initiate action to ensure that violations are not

repeated.

2.The Licensee will withdraw its request for a contested case pending before

the Administrative Law Judge Division.

3.In consideration of the remedial action taken by the Facility, the

Department agrees to suspend $17,450 of the $26,450 total monetary penalty

assessed against the Facility. The Fcility agrees to submit payment of a $9,000

monetary penalty to the Department. Payment is to be paid in two equal installments.

The first installment of $4,500 is due and payable to the Department within thirty

(30) days of execution of this Consent Order. The remaining $4,500 of the $9,000

penalty is to be paid to the Department within 30 (thirty) days of the first payment.

Payment is to be made by check or money order made payable to the S.C.

Department of Health and Environmental Control and shall be sent to the following

address:


Attention: Earl Bleakley

Division of Health Licensing

S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control

2600 Bull Street

Columbia, S.C. 29201


4.It is understood by the Licensee that S.C. Code Ann. § 44-7-320(D)

(2002) states that “Failure to pay a penalty within thirty days is grounds for

suspension, revocation, or denial of a renewal of a license. No license may be issued,

reissued, or renewed until all penalties finally assessed against a person or facility

have been paid.”

5.If violation(s) previously cited recur in subsequent inspections by the

Department during the twelve-month period following execution of this Consent

Agreement, the Department may require immediate payment of all or part of the

suspended portion of the assessed penalty and/or may impose an additional penalty

payable to the Department pursuant to Section 302 F., S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 61-84

(Supp. 2002).

6.The Department in no way waives its authority to enforce, by imposing

penalties or otherwise, all statutory and regulatory requirements for the licensure of

the Facility.

7.Future violations or repeat violations of the regulations or applicable

licensing statutes may result in the imposition of penalties or revocation of the license

to operate the Facility, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 44-7-320 (Supp. 2003), and the

facility administrator has been informed of these potential actions.

8.No additional statements, inducements or promises have been

made by either party in consideration for entering into this Consent Agreement.

9.The Licensee understands that this Consent Agreement governs only the

above penalty action and does not affect or purport to affect any other liability,

whether civil, criminal, regulatory or other that may exist as a result of these

violations.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED


May 7, 2004

Carolyn C. MatthewsDate

Administrative Law Judge


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court