South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDOR vs. Wendy Lou Soloman, d/b/a Wendy's Amusements, et al

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondents:
Wendy Lou Soloman, d/b/a Wendy's Amusements; d/b/a The Place; d/b/a Wendy's
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
96-ALJ-17-0311-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties have reached settlement and resolution of the above matter. The terms of settlement are set forth in the Settlement Order filed with this Court on August 21, 1996, which is attached hereto.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-captioned case bearing Docket Number

96-ALJ-17-0311-CC is hereby dismissed pursuant to the terms of the attached Settlement Order filed with this Court on August 21, 1996.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



_______________________________________

STEPHEN P. BATES

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

August 21, 1996

Columbia, South Carolina




STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION

Docket No: 96-ALJ-17-0311-CC

S.C. Department of Revenue,

Petitioner,

vs.

Wendy Lou Solomon, d/b/a Wendy's

Amusements; d/b/a The Place; d/b/a Wendy's,

Respondent.

SETTLEMENT ORDER



This matter comes before me on the citation issued by the South Carolina Department of Revenue against the respondent for violation of the Video Game Machines Act [S.C. Code Ann. § 12-21-2770 et sec (Supp. 1995)]. Respondent was cited for having more than five machines licensed under S.C. Code Ann. § 12-21-2720(A)(3) (Supp. 1995) at a single place or premises. Respondent ceased operating in violation of the law soon after being cited by the Petitioner, and it appears to the Petitioner that Respondent is no longer in business at the premises where the violation took place. Prior to a hearing being held, the parties reached an agreement resolving the matter, and that agreement is incorporated into this Order.

The agreement between the parties is as follows:

1. Respondent consents to the revocation of all licenses on the premises of 5341 Dorchester Road, Units B, C, and D, North Charleston, South Carolina, on March 22, 1996. Those license numbers are: 41840, 41843, 41731, 41732, 41844, 41845, 41735, 41839, 41847, 41841, 41842, 41849, 027501, 41846, and 41848.

2. Respondent agrees not to operate any machine licensed under the provisions of S.C. Code Ann. § 12-21-2720(A)(3) (Supp. 1995) at the premises at 5341 Dorchester Road, North Charleston, South Carolina, for a period of six months from the date of this order.

3. Petitioner agrees not to seek a monetary penalty for the violation.

4. Nothing in this settlement Order shall be construed to allow the continued operation of machines in a county that voted against the continued operation of such machines in the recent public referendum.

I find the above settlement to be fair and equitable, approve such settlement and hereby Order its adoption.

WE SO CONSENT:





By:____________________________

Nicholas P. Sipe, Chief Counsel for

Regulatory Litigation

Attorney for Petitioner





By:_____________________________

Wendy Lou Soloman, Respondent

IT IS SO ORDERED.



______________________________

STEPHEN P. BATES

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

August 21, 1996

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2022 South Carolina Administrative Law Court