ORDERS:
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The parties have reached settlement and resolution of the above matter. The terms of settlement
are set forth in the Settlement Order filed with this Court on August 21, 1996, which is attached
hereto.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-captioned case bearing Docket Number
96-ALJ-17-0311-CC is hereby dismissed pursuant to the terms of the attached Settlement Order
filed with this Court on August 21, 1996.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
_______________________________________
STEPHEN P. BATES
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
August 21, 1996
Columbia, South Carolina
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DIVISION
Docket No: 96-ALJ-17-0311-CC
S.C. Department of Revenue,
Petitioner,
vs.
Wendy Lou Solomon, d/b/a Wendy's
Amusements; d/b/a The Place; d/b/a Wendy's,
Respondent.
SETTLEMENT ORDER
This matter comes before me on the citation issued by the South Carolina Department of Revenue
against the respondent for violation of the Video Game Machines Act [S.C. Code Ann. §
12-21-2770 et sec (Supp. 1995)]. Respondent was cited for having more than five machines
licensed under S.C. Code Ann. § 12-21-2720(A)(3) (Supp. 1995) at a single place or premises.
Respondent ceased operating in violation of the law soon after being cited by the Petitioner, and it
appears to the Petitioner that Respondent is no longer in business at the premises where the
violation took place. Prior to a hearing being held, the parties reached an agreement resolving the
matter, and that agreement is incorporated into this Order.
The agreement between the parties is as follows:
1. Respondent consents to the revocation of all licenses on the premises of 5341 Dorchester
Road, Units B, C, and D, North Charleston, South Carolina, on March 22, 1996. Those license
numbers are: 41840, 41843, 41731, 41732, 41844, 41845, 41735, 41839, 41847, 41841, 41842,
41849, 027501, 41846, and 41848.
2. Respondent agrees not to operate any machine licensed under the provisions of S.C. Code
Ann. § 12-21-2720(A)(3) (Supp. 1995) at the premises at 5341 Dorchester Road, North
Charleston, South Carolina, for a period of six months from the date of this order.
3. Petitioner agrees not to seek a monetary penalty for the violation.
4. Nothing in this settlement Order shall be construed to allow the continued operation of
machines in a county that voted against the continued operation of such machines in the recent
public referendum.
I find the above settlement to be fair and equitable, approve such settlement and hereby Order its
adoption.
WE SO CONSENT:
By:____________________________
Nicholas P. Sipe, Chief Counsel for
Regulatory Litigation
Attorney for Petitioner
By:_____________________________
Wendy Lou Soloman, Respondent
IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________________
STEPHEN P. BATES
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
August 21, 1996
Columbia, South Carolina |