South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDOR vs. TBHL, Inc., d/b/a Glitters, et al

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondents:
TBHL, Inc., d/b/a Glitters and d/b/a Armadillo, d/b/a Dog, d/b/a Buffalo, d/b/a Frog, and d/b/a Eagle; and Ingram Investments, d/b/a Hilton Head
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
00-ALJ-17-0675-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is before the Court based on the issuance of Administrative Violations and the South Carolina Department of Revenue's Final Determination to TBHL, Inc. d/b/a Glitters, Armadillo, Dog, Buffalo, Frog, and Eagle, and to Ingram Investments d/b/a Hilton Head Amusements (collectively, hereinafter "Respondents") citing April 12, 2000 violations of S.C. Code Ann. § 12-21-2804 (A); S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 117-190; S.C. Code Ann. § 12-21-2748; and , S.C. Code Ann. §12-21-2791. Respondents appealed the Department's Determination seeking review of the violations charged and the penalties imposed. It appears the Department and the Respondents have resolved all issues in this case without the necessity of a contested case hearing. Their resolution is incorporated in this Order.

1. The Respondents agree to pay a penalty in the amount of Six Thousand Two Hundred and 00/100 ($6,200.00) Dollars in satisfaction of all matters in issue in the above-captioned case.

2. The parties agree said penalty amount is to be debited from money currently held by the Department and attributable to the value of the licenses in issue in this case.

3. After accounting for the penalty amount, the Department shall refund to Ingram Investments the remaining balance of the money in issue.

4. The parties further agree that as it pertains to the above-captioned case, this constitutes the full and final resolution of this matter, with any and all issues which could have been brought, claimed, or raised in this matter being expressly waived by the Department, TBHL, Inc., Ingram Investments, and Respondents.

5. Accordingly, the Respondents have withdrawn their request for a contested case hearing.

I find the agreement between the Department and Respondents to be fair and equitable, approve the agreement, and hereby order its adoption. Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing, this case is dismissed with prejudice.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



Sept. 13, 2001 Carolyn C. Matthews

Administrative Law Judge



WE SO CONSENT: WE SO CONSENT:



South Carolina TBHL, Inc., and Ingram Investments

Department of Revenue



Michael K. Kendree J. Brent Kiker

Counsel for Petitioner Counsel for Respondents


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2021 South Carolina Administrative Law Court