ORDERS:
CONSENT ORDER
On July 5, 2000, the South Carolina Department of Revenue issued a Final Determination finding that one or both of the Respondents
had violated certain specified provisions of the Bingo Act of l989, as amended, S.C. Code Ann. § 12-21-3310 et seq. (1), The
Department further notified Respondents that it was assessing a total monetary penalty of $2,000 for these violations against both
parties pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. §§ 12-21-3380 & 3350 [repealed]. Respondents contested the determination and penalties, and
this case was assigned to the undersigned for a contested case hearing.
Respondents have now paid the $2,000 penalty to the Department, in full, in order to resolve this contested matter in its entirety.
I find that the agreement of the parties is a satisfactory resolution of the contested matter between the parties, is fair and reasonable,
and hereby order its adoption.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RAY N. STEVENS
Administrative Law Judge
October 16, 2000
Columbia, South Carolina
I SO MOVE:
Geoffrey R. Bonham
Attorney for Petitioner
S.C. Department of Revenue
PO Box 125
Columbia, SC 29214
(803) 898-5168
I CONSENT:
H. Fred Kuhn, Jr.
Attorney for Respondents
Moss & Kuhn, P. A.
1501 North Street
P.O. Drawer 507
Beaufort, SC 29901-0507
(843) 524-3373
1. This act was repealed by Act No. 449 § 4, 1996 S.C. Acts 2714, 2730. Section 3 of the same Act, however, provides that "[a]ll
proceedings pending and rights and liabilities existing, acquired or incurred at the time [Act No., 449] takes effect are saved and may
be consummated according to the law in force when they were commenced." |
