South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Giannone Importing, Inc. d/b/a New York Style Italian Deli vs. SCDOR

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Giannone Importing, Inc. d/b/a New York Style Italian Deli

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Revenue
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
99-ALJ-17-0611-CC

APPEARANCES:
Toni Pennington, Attorney for Petitioner

Arlene D. Hand, Attorney for Respondent (excused)

Kara Anne Serradimigni and Frank Bartolomeo, Protestants
 

ORDERS:

FINAL ORDER AND DECISION

This matter comes before the Administrative Law Judge Division ("ALJD") pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 61-4-520 (Supp. 1998) and 23 S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 7-90 (1976) following the Petitioner's request for a contested case hearing. The Petitioner, Giannone Importing, Inc. d/b/a New York Style Italian Deli, seeks an on-premises beer and wine permit. After the Protestants filed written protests with the South Carolina Department of Revenue ("DOR"), and upon the Petitioner's request, this matter was transmitted by DOR to the ALJD for a hearing. A hearing was held on January 18, 2000 at the Administrative Law Judge Division in Columbia, South Carolina.

DISCUSSION

Protestant Frank Bartolomeo was the only Protestant to testify. His testimony primarily addressed the lease and sublease of the proposed location. Protestant Bartolomeo insists the Petitioner is not properly and legally on the premises and that the Petitioner has violated the terms of the lease as well as building codes and zoning ordinances. Protestant Bartolomeo states that these allegations are evidence of the Petitioner's lack of character and dictate that the requested permit be denied.

Protestant Bartolomeo challenged the suitability of the location because, according to him, the distance between the building and the highway is 23 feet and is too narrow to be used by intoxicated drivers.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Having carefully considered the testimony and the arguments, and taking into account the credibility of the evidence, I find by a preponderance of the evidence:

1. The Petitioner, Giannone Importing, Inc., d/b/a New York Style Italian Deli, seeks an on-premises beer and wine permit for an establishment located at 5223 North Kings Hwy., Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, in Horry County.

2. Prior to the hearing, DOR moved to be excused from participation in the hearing. In their motion, DOR indicated that it does not oppose the Petitioner's application and would have granted the permit but for the protests. The motion was granted.

3. The parties and the Protestants received notice of the time, date, place, and subject matter of this hearing.

4. The Protestants are the owners of the building. Their predecessor in interest, Jimmy P. Jordan, leased the premises to Rick Baumann. Mr. Baumann sub-leased the premises to Giovanni Giannone.

5. The proposed location is not currently licensed. It was, however, licensed in the name of Rick Baumann d/b/a Uptown Seafood, Inc. for off-premises beer and wine from approximately 1993 through 1999. Jimmy P. Jordan owned the property in 1993 when Baumann first applied for a beer and wine license. No one protested that application. There were no violations of the license.

6. The State Law Enforcement Division ("SLED") completed a criminal background investigation of the Petitioner. SLED's report revealed no criminal violations.



CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Based on these Findings of Fact, I conclude:

1. The ALJD has subject matter jurisdiction in this matter pursuant to Chapter 23 of Title 1 of the 1976 Code, as amended.

2. S.C. Code Ann. § 61-4-520 (Supp. 1998) provides that an applicant for a beer and wine permit must be "of good moral character."



3. Whether or not Petitioner is properly and legally on the premises; has defaulted on the lease; has violated the terms of the lease; or has violated building codes or zoning ordinances are issues to be addressed by another tribunal. In fact, at least some of the aforementioned issues are presently pending in another tribunal, and until these issues are resolved, I cannot adjudge, as Mr. Bartolomeo desires, that the Petitioner lacks the moral character as required by S.C. Code Ann. § 61-4-520 (Supp. 1998)

4. Without further evidence, I cannot conclude that the 23 feet between the building and highway would render the location unsuitable.

5. Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions on Law as set forth herein, the Petitioner's application for an on-premises beer and wine permit must be granted.



ORDER

THEREFORE, DOR shall continue processing the Petitioner's application for an on-premises beer and wine permit for the establishment located at 5223 North Kings Hwy., Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



______________________________

C. DUKES SCOTT

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE



January 26, 2000

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court