South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Walter T. Leopard, Jr., d/b/a T's Party Shop and T's Discount ABC Store vs. SCDOR

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Walter T. Leopard, Jr., d/b/a T's Party Shop and T's Discount ABC Store

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Revenue
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
96-ALJ-17-0368-CC

APPEARANCES:
For the Petitioner: Thomas J. Thompson, Esquire

For the Respondent: Arlene D. Hand, Esquire

For the Protestants: David W. Holmes, Esquire
 

ORDERS:

FINAL DECISION

This matter comes before me pursuant to S.C. Code Ann.  1-23-310 et seq. (Supp. 1995) for a hearing pursuant to the applications of Walter T. Leopard, Jr., for an off-premise beer and wine permit (AI 109072) and a retail liquor license (AI 109073) for a location on Highway 14, Old Texaco Building, Gray Court, Laurens County, South Carolina ("location").

Notice of the date, time, place and nature of the hearing was given to all parties and to the Protestants of record whose names were listed in the Transmittal forwarded to the Administrative Law Judge Division ("Division") by the Department of Revenue ("Department"). On August 19, 1996, this Tribunal received a letter from the Department, requesting that it be excused from having to appear or be represented at the hearing. An Order was signed by me on September 3, 1996 excusing the Department from attending the hearing since the issue of suitability of the location was based upon a protest by numerous individuals and citizens ("Protestants") of the Town of Gray Court. However, since Ms. Hand was already in Spartanburg, South Carolina on the morning of the hearing, she appeared on behalf of the Department.

This hearing was held on October 18, 1996, at the Spartanburg County Courthouse, Spartanburg, South Carolina. After the record was opened but prior to taking any testimony, the attorneys for both the Applicant and the Protestants advised that they had reached an agreement which they wished to present to the Court for its consideration and approval. The agreement provides that the Applicant will continue with his application for an off-premise beer and wine permit at the location but will withdraw his application for a retail liquor license. The Protestants agree to withdraw their protest solely to the off-premise beer and wine permit application.

Upon questioning Ms. Cheyenne Workman (spokesperson for the sixteen (16) Protestants appearing at the hearing) and the Applicant I have determined that the agreement of the parties and the Protestants reflects their wishes and should be made a part of this Order. Further, after reviewing the file I conclude that the Applicant has met and complied with all statutory provisions for the grant of the off-premise beer and wine permit at the location.

ORDER

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that Petitioner's application for an off-premise beer and wine permit (AI 109072) for the location at Highway 14, Town of Gray Court, Laurens County, South Carolina be granted and the Department shall issue the permit to the Applicant upon payment of the prescribed fee(s) and bond(s), and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the request by the Applicant for a contested case hearing to determine the issue of the grant or denial of the retail liquor license request (AI 109073) be dismissed.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________________
Marvin F. Kittrell
Chief Judge

Columbia, South Carolina
October 21, 1996


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court