South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
The Willows at York vs. SCDHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
The Willows at York

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
01-ALJ-07-0156-CC

APPEARANCES:
Jerry L. Paul, Director
Health Licensing Section

Josephine Patton, DHEC Attorney

Cathy Clark, Administrator
The Willows of York

James L. Ward, Jr., Attorney
The Willows of York
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS



  • On February 2, 2001, a representative of the Department's Division of Health

Licensing visited The Willows at York to conduct a complaint investigation. During this investigation, violations and repeat violations of S.C. Reg. 61-84, Standards for Licensing Community Residential Care Facilities, were cited. A Summary of the violations and repeat violations, as shown on Attachment A, which are incorporated herein by reference.

2. After careful review, the Department determined in appropriate to impose a monetary

penalty of five thousand four hundred ($5,400.00) dollars on the facility. This penalty was in accordance with S.C. Code § 44-7-320 (C) which states:

The penalty imposed by the department for violation of this article or its regulations must be not less than one hundred nor more than five thousand dollars for each violation of any of the provisions of this article. Each day's violation is considered a subsequent offense.



3. The Department notified Petitioner by letter dated March 5, 2001 of its decision to

impose the monetary penalty. An appeal followed Petitioner's receipt of that letter.

4. The summary reflects that the Department used its discretion to impose the monetary penalty.



5. Petitioner, in responding to the noted violations, outlined measures to mitigate and



prevent future violations. Specifically, Petitioner has submitted to the Department documentation that those measures outlined in its response have been implemented and are incorporation into its policy and procedures.

THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED



1. In consideration of the above and in an effort to amenably resolve this matter without further proceeding, the Department agrees to suspend $1,400 of the assessed penalty and the Petitioner agrees to pay to the Department the sum of $3,000 within ten days of receipt of this

executed Consent Order.



2. It is understood by the Petitioner that Section 44-7-320 (D) of the S.C. Code of Laws states that "Failure to pay a penalty within thirty days is grounds for suspension, revocation, or denial of a renewal of a license. No license may be issued, reissued, or renewed until all penalties

finally assessed against a person or facility have been paid."

3. If the facility fails to meet the above stated stipulations within the time frame indicated the Department may call in all or part of the suspended penalty. Additionally, if repeat violations of those sections noted in Attachment A are noted during subsequent inspections by the Department during the twelve month period following execution of this Consent Order, the Department may require payment of all or part of the suspended portion of the assessed penalty and/or may impose a penalty in accordance with Section 103 D., R 61-84, and the Petitioner shall immediately pay to the Department the assessed penalty.

4. The Department in no way waives its authority to enforce, by imposing penalties or



otherwise, all statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to the licensure of the Willows at



York.



5. The Petitioner, or its designee, shall take immediate steps to correct all violations noted in Attachment A and all violations noted by the Department in previous inspections. The Petitioner will establish and maintain procedures to ensure that violations in Attachment A and similar violations of R 61-84, Standards for Licensing Community Residential Care Facilities, do not occur in the future.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.







July 23, 2001

Ray N. Stevens Date

Administrative Law Judge


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court