South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Julie L. Behles, d/b/a Hog Heaven vs. SCDOR

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Julie L. Behles, d/b/a Hog Heaven

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Revenue
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
95-ALJ-17-0103-CC

APPEARANCES:
For the Petitioner: Pro Se

For the Respondent/South Carolina Department of Revenue and Taxation: No Appearance

For the Protestants: No Appearance
 

ORDERS:

ORDER AND DECISION

STATEMENT OF THE CASE


This matter comes before the Administrative Law Judge Division pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. §§61-1-55, et seq. (Supp. 1993) and S. C. Code Ann. §§1-23-310 et seq. (1986 and Supp. 1993) for a contested case hearing. The Applicant, Julie L. Behles, seeks an off-premise beer and wine permit for Hog Heaven. A hearing was held on April 12, 1995, at the office of Administrative Law Judge Division, 1205 Pendleton Street, Columbia, South Carolina.

The permit requested by the Applicant is approved.



FINDINGS OF FACT


1. The court has subject matter jurisdiction of this case.

2. The Applicant seeks an off-premise beer and wine permit for Hog Heaven, 5400 Cope Road, Cope, South Carolina 29038.

3. Notice of the time, date, place and subject matter of the hearing was given to the Applicant, Protestants, and South Carolina Department of Revenue.

4. The qualifications set forth in S. C. Code Ann. § 61-9-320 concerning the residency and age of the Applicant are properly established. Furthermore, the Applicant has not had a permit or license revoked within the last two years and notice of the application was lawfully posted both at the location and in a newspaper of general circulation.

5. The Applicant is of sufficient moral character to receive a beer and wine permit.

6. The proposed location is not close to any church, school or playground.

7. The current owner of the business located at the proposed location has held a beer and wine permit for the last five years. There have been no problems or discipline associated with that permit during that time period. Furthermore, that Applicant has never had a permit or license revoked for any reason.

8. The proposed location is within the City of Cope. The location can be described best as a "mom and pop" type grocery store. The Applicant stated that if any individual purchasing beer or wine attempts to loiter or remain on the property to consume the purchase, she would be able to both observe them and also promptly tell them to leave the premises.

This proposed location is suitable for the sale of beer and wine off-premise.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I conclude as a matter of law the following:

1. Section 1-23-600 S.C. Code Ann. (Supp. 1993) grants jurisdiction to the Administrative Law Judge Division to hear contested cases under the Administrative Procedures Act.

2. Section 61-1-55 S.C. Code Ann. (Supp. 1993) grants to the Administrative Law Judge Division the powers, duties and responsibilities as hearing officer in protested and contested matters governing alcoholic beverages, beer and wine.





3. Section 61-9-320 S.C. Code Ann.(Supp. 1993) sets forth the requirements for the issuance of an on-premise beer and wine permit.

4. As trier of fact, an Administrative Law Judge is authorized to determine the fitness or suitability of the proposed location of an applicant for a permit or license to sell alcohol, beer or wine using broad but not unbridled discretion. Byers v. S. C. ABC Commission, 316 S.E. 2d 705 (S.C. App. 1984).

5. The determination of suitability of a location is not necessarily a function of geography. It involves an infinite variety of considerations related to the nature and operation of the proposed business and its impact on the community within which it is located. Kearney v. Allen, 287 S.C. 324, 338 S.E. 2d 335 (1985).

6. Section 61-9-340 S.C. Code (Supp. 1993) provides that upon determination that the applicant meets the criteria for the issuance of a permit or license, and has not misstated or concealed a fact in the application, the South Carolina Department of Revenue and Taxation must issue the permit after payment of the prescribed fee.

7. I conclude that the Applicant meets all the statutory requirements for holding an off-premise beer and wine permit at the proposed location.



ORDER


This is the Order based upon the Findings of Fact and conclusions of law, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the application of Julie L. Behles for an off-premise beer and wine permit for Hog Heaven on 5400 Cope Road, Cope, South Carolina be granted upon the Applicant's payment of the required fee and cost to the South Carolina Department of Revenue and Taxation.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



______________________________________

Judge Ralph King Anderson, III

Administrative Law Judge

April 20, 1995

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court