ORDERS:
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Grievance No. KER-0193-00
This matter is before the Administrative Law Judge Division ("Division") pursuant to Appellant's Notice of Appeal filed August 14,
2000. The undersigned takes notice that the Notice of Appeal was not timely filed with the Division.
According to ALJD Temporary Rule 62, the Notice of Appeal must be filed with the Division within thirty days of receipt of the
decision from which the appeal is taken. In this case, Appellant admits he received the final decision on July 11, 2000. The Notice of
Appeal, therefore, was due on or before August 10, 2000. ALJD Temporary Rule 65 provides "an Administrative Law Judge may
dismiss an appeal for failure to comply with any of the rules of procedure for appeals, including the failure to comply with any of the
time limits provided by this section." Pursuant to this rule, the undersigned can dismiss this case for failure to timely file a Notice of
Appeal as required by ALJD Temporary Rule 62.
Furthermore, the failure to timely file a Notice of Appeal deprives a court of appellate jurisdiction. See Dewitt v. South Carolina
Dep't of Highways & Pub. Transp., 274 S.C. 184, 262 S.E.2d 28 (1980) (a circuit court's jurisdiction over a magistrate's decision is
appellate in nature and a circuit court does not have the right to extend the time within which an appeal may be taken from the
magistrate's decision). Because the Division acts as an appellate court in inmate cases filed pursuant to Al-Shabazz v. State, 338 S.C.
354, 527 S.E.2d 742 (2000), the Division lacks jurisdiction in cases where the inmate fails to timely file a Notice of Appeal. As a
result, the Division finds sua sponte that it lacks jurisdiction in this case.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant's appeal is dismissed with prejudice.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________________________________
C. DUKES SCOTT
Administrative Law Judge
September 8, 2000
Columbia, South Carolina
APPEAL RIGHTS
You are entitled to appeal this final order of the Administrative Law Judge Division by filing a petition for judicial review in circuit
court and serving such petition on opposing parties within thirty (30) days after receipt of this order. S.C. Code Ann. § 1-23-610
(Supp. 1999). The petition may be filed in any circuit court as long as the chosen forum is neither arbitrary nor unreasonable, and
provided that no statute controls venue in a particular type of case. The review of the administrative law judge's order must be
confined to the record. The reviewing tribunal may affirm the decision or remand the case for further proceedings; or it may reverse or
modify the decision if the substantive rights of the petitioner have been prejudiced because the finding, conclusion, or decision is: (a) in
violation of constitutional or statutory provisions; (b) in excess of the statutory authority of the agency; (c) made upon unlawful
procedure; (d) affected by other error of law; (e) clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative and substantial evidence on the
whole record; or (f) arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion. |