South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Punchibar, LLC, d/b/a Mi Tierra vs. SCDOR

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Punchibar, LLC, d/b/a Mi Tierra
1262 Remount Road, North Charleston, South Carolina

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Revenue
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
06-ALJ-17-0486-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER

The above-captioned matter comes before this Court pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 61-2-260 (Supp. 2005), S.C. Code Ann. § 1-23-600(B) (Supp. 2005), and S.C. Code Ann. §§ 1-23-310 et seq. (2005) for a contested case hearing. In this matter, Petitioner Punchibar, LLC, seeks an on-premises beer and wine permit and a license to sell liquor by the drink for its restaurant, Mi Tierra, located at 1262 Remount Road in North Charleston, South Carolina. Respondent South Carolina Department of Revenue (Department) denied Petitioner’s application for the permit and license because of protests regarding the suitability of the proposed location filed by the City of North Charleston and by John and Marie Genes, a couple residing on property immediately behind the location. After timely notice to the parties and the protestants, a hearing of this case was held on August 17, 2006, at the South Carolina Administrative Law Court in Columbia, South Carolina.[1] As discussed below, Petitioner entered into a number of stipulations upon its license at the hearing that alleviated the concerns of the protestants, such that they were willing to withdraw their protest of Petitioner’s permit and license application.

STIPULATIONS

Pursuant to ALC Rule 25(C), Rule 43(k), SCRCP, and 23 S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 7-200.1(I) (Supp. 2005), Petitioner stipulated at the hearing to the following requirements being incorporated into its permit and license as conditions of licensure:

1. Petitioner stipulated that it would construct a six-foot-high, wooden privacy fence along the rear of its property and along the portion of its property bordering North Murray Avenue, to ensure that the property is only accessible from Remount Road.

2. Petitioner stipulated that it would place additional lighting behind the establishment to fully illuminate the area to the rear of the business.

3. Petitioner stipulated that it would implement a policy requiring patrons to either enter the restaurant or leave the property, in order to prevent loitering on the property.

4. Petitioner stipulated that a violation of local noise ordinances committed by its establishment would constitute a violation of its permit and license. With regard to noise issues, Petitioner further stipulated that it would investigate better ways to sound-proof the establishment.

Pursuant to Regulation 7-200.1(I), these stipulations are incorporated into the basic requirements for the enjoyment and privilege of obtaining and retaining Petitioner’s beer and wine permit and liquor-by-the-drink license and shall have the same effect as any and all laws and any and all other regulations pertaining to the permit and license. 23 S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 7-200.1(I) (Supp. 2005). Further, a knowing violation of the terms of these stipulations shall constitute sufficient grounds to suspend, revoke, or otherwise penalize Petitioner’s permit and license. Id. With the incorporation of these stipulations into the terms of Petitioner’s permit and license, the protestants of record, John and Marie Genes, agreed at the hearing to withdraw their protest of Petitioner’s application and to consent to the issuance of the permit and license in question.

ORDER

Based upon the agreement of the parties reached at the hearing of this matter,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Department shall GRANT Petitioner’s application for an on-premises beer and wine permit and restaurant license to sell liquor by the drink for the premises located at 1262 Remount Road in North Charleston, South Carolina, with the incorporation of the stipulations stated above as conditions upon the issuance and retention of the permit and license.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

JOHN D. GEATHERS

Administrative Law Judge

1205 Pendleton Street, Suite 224

Columbia, South Carolina 29201-3731

August 22, 2006

Columbia, South Carolina



[1] Prior to the hearing, however, the City of North Charleston withdrew its protest of Petitioner’s application, leaving John and Marie Genes as the sole protestants of record in this matter.


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court