ORDERS:
CONSENT ORDER
STATEMENT
OF THE CASE
This matter
comes before me on Petition of the South Carolina Department of Consumer
Affairs of November 24, 2008, for the Respondents Lake Swamp Ventures, John M.
McCutcheon, Jr., and Derek T. Owens to show cause why cease and desist, and
restraining orders should not be issued requiring Respondents to refrain from
engaging in violations of the South Carolina Pawn Broker Act; why Respondents’
Certificate of Authority should not be revoked; why their special deposit bond
should not be assessed to repay affected consumers; and why an administrative
fine of $750.00 per violation not to exceed $15,000.00 should not be assessed
against Respondents, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. §§ 40-39-10 et seq.
FINDINGS
OF FACT
1. The
Respondent Lake Swamp Ventures, LLC, is a limited liability company organized
under the laws of the State of South Carolina, and at the times concerned
herein offered pawnbroker services to consumers at 212 Ron McNair Blvd., Lake City, Florence County, South Carolina.
2. Respondent
Lake Swamp Ventures, LLC, d/b/a Cash Cow Pawn & Gun (Cash Cow) has held a
pawnbroker Certificate of Authority and/or operated at 212 Ron McNair Blvd.,
Lake City, Florence County, South Carolina since May 2006.
3. Respondents
John M. McCutcheon (McCutcheon) and Derek T. Owens (Owens) are the two
principle officers, directors, or owners of Respondent Lake Swamp Ventures,
LLC.
4. Respondents
were two months delinquent in filing for a Certificate of Authority for the
2008-2009 filing year, eventually obtaining a Certificate of Authority on
September 3, 2008.
5. Petitioner’s
staff conducted a compliance review of Respondent Cash Cow Pawn & Gun on
June 26, 2008, noting the following deficiencies in their record keeping and
practices:
I.
Pawn tickets were not being kept in numerical sequence, pursuant to
Regulation 28-200C (1)(C), (This deficiency was also noted in an April 26, 2007
review);
II. Pawned
and sold merchandise were not being properly tagged, pursuant to Regulation
28-200 C (4), (This deficiency was also noted in the April 26, 2007 review);
III Several
items of sold merchandise that were being held during the seven day hold period
were in a public area, but were not tagged “Not for Sale”, as required by
Regulation 28-200 D.(5), (This deficiency was also noted in the April 26, 2007
review);
IV. Several
items that had been sold to the Respondents and were within the seven day hold
period could not be located as required by Regulation 28-200 D. (2), (This
deficiency was also noted in the April 26, 2007 review); and
V. One
item of merchandise that had been forfeited to Respondents was not listed as
such in Respondents’ records as required by Regulation 28-200C. (2).
6. During
the June 26, 2008, compliance review, the Department’s investigator noted nine
instances of Respondents making unsecured consumer loans or “fresh air loans”,
i.e., loans of money to consumers in which there was no item of personalty (or
other collateral) pledged to secure the loan, pursuant to §40-39-10(2), (3)
& (7), and in violation of S.C. Code Ann., §§37-3-502 & 37-3-512
of the South Carolina Consumer Protection Code.
7. During
the June 26, 2008 compliance review, the Department’s investigator noted that
there were two employees, Otis Hutchinson and Leon Graham, working in
Respondents’ business even though owner/employee forms and fingerprint
verification forms from law enforcement on these employees had not been
submitted to the Department prior to their employment, pursuant to §40-39-20 of
the Act and 28-200 B.
8. Respondent
McCutcheon purported to resolve these issues in an unsigned letter submitted to
the Department in August 2008.
9. Two
additional employees, James Hanna and Julie Hutchinson, were working in
Respondents’ business even though owner/employee forms and fingerprint
verification forms from law enforcement on these employees had not been
submitted to the Department prior to their employment, pursuant to §40-39-20 of
the Act and 28-200 B.
10. Otis
Hutchinson is a convicted felon which would not allow him to work as a
pawnbroker in Respondents’ business, pursuant to § 40-39-20 of the Act, and
that Respondent concealed this fact from Petitioner and continued to employ
him after asserting in writing he would not do so.
11. Petitioner’s
investigator visited Respondent Cash Cow on November 6, 2008, and found
several employees working there including James Hanna.
12. Respondents
McCutcheon and Owens were evicted from Respondent Cash Cow Pawn & Gun at 212 Ron McNair Blvd, Lake City, SC, on November 17, 2008.
13. Petitioner
currently has approximately twelve (12) open unresolved complaints filed
against Respondents as result of the closure of Cash Cow Pawn & Gun.
14 Petitioner
has inventoried the remaining merchandise at Respondent Cash Cow, and has
conducted at least three redemption opportunities for pledgors to obtain their
pawned items.
15. Petitioner
will conduct at least two more redemption opportunities for pledgors in January
and February 2009 .
16. Petitioner
is currently holding redemption monies collected from consumers in an escrow
account.
CONCLUSIONS
OF LAW
1. The
Petitioner is an agency of the State of South Carolina and is responsible for
administering and enforcing the South Carolina Pawnbroker Act (The Act)(S.C.
Code Ann. §§40-39-10 et seq.)
2. Petitioner
is authorized by S.C. Code Ann. §37-6-104 of the South Carolina Consumer
Protection Code to “...Receive and act on complaints, take action designed to
obtain voluntary compliance with this title, or commence proceedings...”.
3. Respondents
have violated five separate and distinct parts of Pawnbroker Regulation 28-200
in numerous instances of improper record keeping, and handling of merchandise.
4. Respondents
have engaged in making unsecured consumer loans, for which they did not have a
license, in violation of S.C. Code Ann., §§37-3-502 & 37-3-512 of
the South Carolina Consumer Protection Code, and which they were not permitted
to do at a pawn shop location, pursuant to §40-39-10(2), (3) & (7).
5. Respondents
employed personnel who had not submitted owner/employee forms or fingerprint
verification forms, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann §40-39-20 of the Act and
Regulation 28-200 B.
6. Respondent
employed a convicted felon in violation of S.C. Code Ann § 40-39-20 of
the Act.
7. Respondents
are required to maintain with the Department of Consumer Affairs evidence of
financial responsibility in the form of a bond or letter of credit in the
amount of five-thousand ($5,000.00) dollars, to be conditioned on the faithful
performance of the duties and responsibilities of a pawnbroker, pursuant to S.C.
Code Ann. §40-39-50.
8. Respondents
bond may be assessed to repay those affected members of the public who may have
a valid claim against Respondents, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. §40-39-50.
9. Respondents
have agreed in separate affidavits attached to this Order (Attachment A) that
redemption monies will be held by the Department in an escrow account until
this Court can determine who should benefit from the collected funds.
10. Respondents
have agreed in a separate Agreement attached to this Order (Attachment B) that
redemption monies on firearms collected by a third party (Steven Sauls) will be
remitted and held by the Department in an escrow account until this Court can
determine who should benefit from the collected funds.
11. Respondents
do not have the requisite net worth and financial responsibility to continue
as a pawnbroker, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann §40-39-50 of the Act, in
light of the eviction for failure to pay rent at 212 Ron McNair Blvd, Lake
City, SC.
12. Respondents Lake Swamp Ventures, LLC, McCutcheon, Owens, and counsel for the Department
have agreed to the terms of this Order.
THEREFORE, based
upon the above, Petitioner and Respondents Lake Swamp Ventures, LLC,
McCutcheon, and Owens, have consented and agreed to the following terms as a
full and final resolution of this matter.
Respondents Lake
Swamp Ventures, LLC, McCutcheon, and Owens will:
. (a) Agree to
assessment in full of their special deposit bond #LLI2008940 issued by Old
Republic Surety Company in the amount of $5,000.00, and made payable to the
Administrator for those affected members of the public who have causes of
action against Respondents for violation of S.C. Code Ann. §§40-39-10 et
seq.;
(b) Allow
Petitioner to hold such monies from special deposit bond #LLI2008940 issued by
Old Republic Surety Company for the statutory period until Petitioner can
determine all consumers who may have been affected during the term of bond
#LLI2008940 ;
(c) Pay
an administrative fine of three thousand ($3,000.00) dollars for violations of
the Act, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. §44-79-80(9);
(d) Cease
and Desist operating as a pawnbroker as defined in S.C. Code Ann. §40-39-10;
and
(e)
Voluntarily and permanently relinquish their Pawnbroker Certificate of
Authority.
(f) Co-operate
with the Department’s staff in resolving any current and future complaints
filed against Respondents.
WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
A. Respondents’
Certificate of Authority is permanently Revoked, pursuant to S.C.
Code Ann. §40-39-150(B).
B. Respondents
are to Cease and Desist offering pawnbroker services at 212 Ron McNair
Blvd, Lake City, SC, or any other South Carolina location, pursuant to S.C.
Code Ann. §40-39-150(A).
C. Respondents
are enjoined from engaging in pawn transactions or acting as a
pawnbroker in South Carolina , as defined in S.C. Code Ann. §40-39-10.
D. Respondent’s
Bond #LL12008940 issued by Old Republic Surety and made payable to the
Administrator for those affected members of the public who may have a cause of
action against Respondents for the fair market value of their pawned
merchandise may be Assessed, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann.
§§40-39-50, 40-39-60, & 40-39-150.
E. Petitioner
may hold such monies from Bond #LL12008940 for the statutory period until
Petitioner can determine any consumers who may have been affected during the
term of the bond.
F. Petitioner
may use the monies it holds in escrow from the redemptions of merchandise it
conducted, and the redemption of the guns by the third party Sauls, to further
reimburse consumers should the bond not cover all claims.
G. Any
money remaining at the end of the statutory period will be refunded to
Respondents.
H. Petitioner
will pay only those valid claims that can be substantiated through Respondents’
records or through Respondents’ co-operation in resolving the complaints.
I. Petitioner
will pay such claims based on the fair market value or assessed value of
merchandise and not replacement value.
J. Respondents
will co-operate with Department staff in supplying any necessary records to
effectuate the orderly return of pledged, layaway, or other property left at
the pawn shop for security, purchase or repair.
K. Respondents
are to voluntarily resolve those complaints it is aware of, make a written
record of the resolution, and forward to the Department.
L. Imposing
an administrative fine on Respondents of three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) for
violations of the Act, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 40-39-150(B).
M. Requiring
such Order to take effect immediately.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED
____________________________
Honorable John D. McLeod
Administrative
Law Judge
________________,
2009
Columbia, South Carolina
We Consent:
____________________________ __________________________
John M. McCutcheon, Jr. Derek
Thompson Owens
________________, 2009 __________________,
2009
Lake City, South Carolina Lake City, South Carolina
_________________________
Helen Fennell
Attorney for
the Petitioner SCDCA
P.O. Box 5757
Columbia, SC 29250
Columbia, South Carolina (803)
734-4241
February 28, 2009
|