South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Town of Lyman vs. SCDHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Town of Lyman

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
07-ALJ-07-0081-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

FINAL ORDER

On February 25, 2008, the parties filed a Consent Order of Settlement of this matter. Pursuant to that agreement, it is hereby

ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________________

PAIGE J. GOSSETT

Administrative Law Judge

February 25, 2008

Columbia, South Carolina


STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT

Town of Lyman,

Petitioner,

vs.

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control,

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 07-ALJ-07-0081-CC

CONSENT ORDER OF SETTLEMENT

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Town of Lyman’s (“Lyman”) or (“Petitioner”) request for a contested case hearing filed on February 23, 2007. Petitioner sought review of various proposed limits, terms, and conditions in the re-issued NPDES Permit No. SC 0021300 to Lyman by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (“Department”).

Prior to a hearing on the merits scheduled to begin on September 4, 2007, the Parties reached a settlement of the issues on August 31, 2007. The Agreement between the parties required the approval of the Region IV of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department has notified the Petitioner that such approval has now been obtained by the Department. The terms and conditions of the Agreement are incorporated into this Order and the provisions related to the specific NPDES Permit Limits for Permit No. SC0021300 are as follows:

1. Calculation of 7Q10 and Allocation to Town of Lyman. In previous NPDES Permits for the Town of Lyman (SC0021300), the wasteload calculations and other discharge parameters have been based upon a low flow condition in the Middle Tyger River of 7.15 cfs. This amount was calculated by using the 7Q10 at USGS Station 02157500 of 18 cfs minus a withdrawal of 7.0 MGD (10.85 cfs) by SJWD Water District or its predecessor owner of the water treatment plant. A review of the 2004 through 2006 Water Production Logs of the SJWD Water Treatment Facility indicate an average pumping of raw water of 7.99 MGD for June 2006, 7.32 for July 2006, and 7.79 MGD for August 2006. These three months represent the highest three months of raw water pumping for the entire year of 2006 and for the three year period of 2004 through 2006 when the only source of supply was the Middle Tyger River. Based upon this data, the allocable 7Q10 for purposes of calculating limits for the Town of Lyman NPDES Permit will be the 7Q10 at USGS Station 02157500 of 18 cfs minus a withdrawal of 8.0 MGD (12.4 cfs) for the SJWD facility or a total of 5.6 cfs plus 0.39 cfs for the basin area between the USGS station 02157500 and the Town of Lyman wastewater discharge into the Middle Tyger River, for a total flow in the Middle Tyger at the Town of Lyman discharge point of 5.99 cfs. The Town of Lyman is accepting this critical condition flow number for purposes of settlement of the contested provisions of the renewal NPDES Permit No. SC0021300 issued by DHEC on November 15, 2006.

2. Utilization of Permit Limits. The NPDES permit limits will be based upon limits calculated at 4.5 MGD and 6.0 MGD design flows, provided however that flow as a limit will be replaced with monitor and report. In addition, interim limits will be based upon a design flow of 4.5 MGD.

3. Metals Limits. The limits described in Paragraph 2 above include limits for metals. The previous permit included limits for total copper and total lead. This permit as drafted presently includes limits for the additional metals of antimony, total cadmium, total mercury, nickel, total silver, and total zinc. The reasonable potential analysis for all additional metals was based upon sampling data that included three data points for each metal submitted by the Town with its application for permit renewal. In order for the Town of Lyman to evaluate compliance with the metals limits, DHEC will consider and incorporate results (where justified) from any of the following requests made by the Town for adjustment of the metal limits via the normal NPDES modification process per R. 61-9.122.62:

(a) Evaluation of additional hardness data of the effluent with calculation of a mixed hardness for purposes of metals limit calculations.

(b) Evaluation of additional data points for each of the additional metals in evaluating both the reasonable potential for the necessity of a limit and calculation of the limit, if necessary. This evaluation could result in a change or elimination for some or all of the additional metals.

(c) Determination of metal limits based upon a water effects ratio study for certain selected metals.

(d) Any other methodology or evaluation that may be selected by the Town of Lyman consistent with DHEC’s NPDES Permit regulations and the Water Quality Classification Standards.

DHEC agrees that a revision to a limit that has not been in effect does not trigger an antibacksliding review.

4. Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Limit. The Town of Lyman is presently involved with compliance with an Administrative Order, Docket No. CWA-04-2006-4798, issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV on July 26, 2006, regarding WET limit violations of the 2001 NPDES Permit. This Order requires the Town to conduct various tests under a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE), conduct other toxicity tests, and to make various reports to EPA. The schedule for completion of the TRE and other tests is anticipated to be June 30, 2008, based upon a request to EPA for an extension to the originally scheduled date which is expected to be approved. As part of compliance with the EPA Administrative Order, the Town may seek to utilize an alternative test species, Daphnia ambigua, in place of Ceriodaphnia dubia. DHEC will modify where appropriate the permit to allow for the WET test to be conducted utilizing the alternative test organism for WET testing and any other test modifications where justified. The permittee must request a modification to the NPDES Permit per R.61-9.122.62.

5. Schedule of Compliance. In order for the Town of Lyman to fully evaluate the metals limits issues described herein, to implement metal limits as appropriate in the pretreatment programs, and to conduct the headworks analysis as required by the permit, DHEC and the Town agree to the following schedule of compliance:

(a) Submit an administrative and technically complete preliminary engineering report (PER) for facility upgrade within one (1) year of the effective date of the permit or if the facility can meet the final limits without an upgrade, submit a written request by the due date of the PER to place the final limits into effect.

(b) Submit a construction permit application for facility upgrade seven (7) months after submission of the PER.

(c) Start construction for facility upgrade six (6) months after submission of the construction permit application.

(d) Complete construction within one (1) year of the start of construction.

(e) Comply with the final effluent limits within four (4) months of completion of construction.

(f) The Pretreatment Works Update will be concluded by July 1, 2008.

The Town reserves the right to request modifications to the schedule of compliance as circumstances may require and where justified per R.61-9.122.62.

6. No Waiver of Right to Contest NPDES Permit Parameters or Limits. By entering into this settlement agreement, the Town does not waive its right to contest any parameter or limit that may be included in future NPDES Permit renewals regardless of whether that parameter or limit was contested or could have been contested with respect to the presently contested NPDES Permit.

I find this Agreement to be fair and equitable, approve such settlement, and hereby ORDER its adoption. This Court retains continuing jurisdiction to enforce this Order.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________________

The Honorable Paige J. Gossett

Administrative Law Judge

March 17, 2008

Columbia, South Carolina

WE CONSENT:

________________________________

W. Thomas Lavender, Jr.

Leon C. Harmon

Joan W. Hartley

NEXSEN PRUET, LLC

Post Office Drawer 2426

Columbia, South Carolina 29202-2426

(803) 771-8900

Attorneys for Petitioner Town of Lyman

_________________________________

Stephen P. Hightower

Office of General Counsel

South Carolina Department of Health

and Environmental Control

2600 Bull Street

Columbia, South Carolina 29201

Attorney for Respondent South Carolina Department of Health

and Environmental Control


~/pdf/070081.pdf
PDF

Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court