South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDHEC vs. Tin Products, Inc.

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

Respondents:
Tin Products, Inc.
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
01-ALJ-07-0067-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

FINAL ORDER AND DECISION

This matter is before the Administrative Law Judge Division ("Division") on pending issues relating to the Emergency Order issued by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control ("DHEC") against Tin Products, Inc. ("Tin Products"). On February 7, 2001, DHEC issued an Emergency Order requiring Tin Products to shut its entire facility down as a result of a fire in the tetrabutyl tin/ tetraoctyl tin ("TBT/TOT") process area.

At the emergency hearing on February 9, DHEC staff testified that the purpose of the Emergency Order was to require Tin Products to shut down the processes, to secure the site and to undertake a comprehensive review of all facilities and procedures. Under S.C. Code Ann.

§ 48- 1-290 (1987), an Emergency Order must be revoked "[a]s soon as conditions or operations change to the extent that an emergency no longer exists." Id.

In the first Order issued by this Division (dated February 13, 2001), the Division found that "the issuance of the emergency order was proper in light of the perceived threat of additional fires at the facility." The Division also found that the stannic chloride line was separate and was unaffected by the fire.

As directed by statute, the Division determined that the Emergency Order relating to the stannic chloride line could be lifted once emergency conditions no longer existed and the line could be safely operated. The Division allowed Tin Products to resume operation of its stannic chloride process once it physically separated the line from the TBT process and once it completed certain tasks (which included repairs and certifications of monitors and valves by an independent engineer). The Division also instructed Tin Products to retain an independent engineering consultant to conduct a process safety management review ("review") of the stannic chloride process.

Tin Products retained RTP Environmental Associates, Inc. ("RTP") to provide the initial certifications and to conduct the review. The parties have now informed the Division that RTP has submitted a final report in compliance with 29 C.F.R. § 1910.119. In the final document, RTP certifies that the following has been accomplished:

1. Tin Products has replaced or repaired inoperable valves;



2. The mechanical integrity of the stannic chloride production line has been

confirmed;



3. Deficiencies in the way certain items are handled, for example, preventive

maintenance, have been identified; and



4. Deficiencies in documentation and written procedures have been

addressed by creating:



a. Revised Piping and Instrument Diagrams for the complete line;

b. Written lesson plans for safety training;

c. Written lesson plans addressing consequences of deviations;

d. Management of Change log and procedures;

e. Standardized procedures for incident investigations; and

f. Revision and standardization of preventive maintenance logs.

Tin Products has agreed to follow all of the recommendations made by RTP.

The RTP documents satisfy the requirement in the February Order and DHEC's Motion for Contempt is now moot.

This Order shall finally dispose of all issues before me relating to the stannic chloride line. The Division's February Order relating to the TBT/TOT line remains in full force and effect, and that portion of the February Order (paragraphs 8-12) is hereby bifurcated from the portion of the Order addressing the stannic chloride line. Tin Products agrees that it will give DHEC advance notice before it resumes any activity relating to the TBT/TOT line. However, the Court has been advised that certain materials in the TBT/TOT line need to be handled, and nothing in the February 13 Order shall constrain the parties from doing so.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.





_________________________________

Ralph King Anderson, III

Administrative Law Judge



May 2, 2001

Columbia, South Carolina


 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2025 South Carolina Administrative Law Court