South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDOR vs. Mary L. Nickles

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondents:
Mary L. Nickles
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
97-ALJ-17-0730-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER

This matter came before the Court from an appeal of the Respondent Mary L. Nickles of a citation issued by the Petitioner South Carolina Department of Revenue ("Department") against the Respondent for a violation of the Video Games Machines Act ("Act"), S.C. Code Ann. Sec. 12-21-2802 (Supp. 1997) on January 31, 1997. The citation issued to Respondent on that date was for a violation of that provision of the Act requiring the posting of penalty signs on all Class III video game machines, S.C. Code Ann. Sec. 12-21-2802. Specifically, the Department cited Respondent for three Class III machines which were found to not have the requisite posted penalty signs. The Regulatory Violation and Assessment Report sought the imposition of a $300.00 monetary penalty for each violation for total fines against the Respondent for these violations of $900.00 . A final Agency Determination was issued by the Department sustaining the imposition of the penalty assessed in the violation report.

A hearing was scheduled in this matter before the Court on March 18, 1998. Prior to he hearing, an agreement was reached between the parties resolving this matter on the following terms and conditions:

1. Respondent Mary L. Nickles agrees to pay a fine of $300.00 and to make payment of the fine to the Department within 15 days of the date of this Order.

2. The Department agrees, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. Section 12-4-320(3)(Supp. 1996), to waive the remaining monetary penalty sought for this violation from the Respondent on the Basis of this being a first offense by the Respondent of the Video Game Machines Act.

3. The parties further agree and understand that this is a compromise and settlement of a contested penalty and is entered by the Department under the authority provided it in S. C. Code Ann. 12-4-320(3) to compromise such matters.

Having reviewed this agreement and settlement in compromise, and having questioned the parties or their respective counsel regarding the terms thereof, I hereby ORDER its adoption and dismiss the Petition in this matter with prejudice.



__________________________ ___ ________________________________

Jeffrey M. Nelson, Esquire James H. Harrison, Esquire

Counsel for Regulatory Litigation Attorney for the Respondent

PO Box 125 1819 Hampton Street

Columbia, SC 29214 Columbia, SC 29201

(803) 737-4426 (803) 256-0049



IT IS SO ORDERED.



________________________________

Ralph K. Anderson

Administrative Law Judge

Columbia, South Carolina

March 16, 1998
























 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2025 South Carolina Administrative Law Court