South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDOR vs. Great Games of North Augusta, Inc., d/b/a/ Players 3, et al

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondents:
Great Games of North Augusta, Inc., d/b/a/ Players 3, Great Games, Inc., and Jimmy L. Martin
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
98-ALJ-17-0045-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR DEFAULT

On January 30, 1998, an ORDER was issued to all parties requiring the filing of a Prehearing Statement within fifteen (15) days of the date of that ORDER. Given the additional five (5) day extension allowed for mailing under ALJD Rule 5(C), the Prehearing Statement was due on February 19, 1998. Great Games of North Augusta, Inc., d/b/a Players 3, Great Games, Inc., and Jimmy L. Martin (Respondents) failed to file the Prehearing Statement.

.

On February 24, 1998, Respondents were again directed to file the Prehearing Statement on or before March 3, 1998. No Prehearing Statement was received by the close of business on the extension date of March 3, 1998 and thus Respondents failed to comply with the Order.

Upon a Respondent's failure to defend an action or upon a failure to adhere to an interlocutory order, the Administrative Law Judge may dismiss a contested case in a manner so as to uphold the position of the complying party. ALJD Rule 23.

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that

1. Due to the Respondents' failure to defend this action, the Respondents are in default.

2. Petitioner, having complied in this matter, is not in default.

3. Petitioner shall proceed with the enforcement of its administrative violation.

4. This matter is ended and the case is dismissed.











AND IT IS SO ORDERED.





RAY N. STEVENS

Administrative Law Judge

This 5th day of March, 1998

Columbia, South Carolina


 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2025 South Carolina Administrative Law Court