CAPTION:
LLR, State Board of Cosmetology vs. Saundra Mack, Felicia Dunham, Jamesha Gerald, Joyce Bradley, Danielle Brown, Diane Sanders, and Chelsea’s Hair and Beauty Supplies |
PARTIES:
Petitioner:
South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, State Board of Cosmetology
Respondents:
Saundra Mack, Felicia Dunham, Jamesha Gerald, Joyce Bradley, Danielle Brown, Diane Sanders, and Chelsea’s Hair and Beauty Supplies |
ORDERS:
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
THIS MATTER COMES before me at the request of the Petitioner, South Carolina
Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, State Board of Cosmetology (“Board”)
which moves for a voluntary dismissal of the above-captioned contested case. By letter dated
January 21, 2004, the Court was notified that the Petitioner wished to withdraw its request for
injunctive relief. The Board has reason to believe that the Respondents have closed their place of
business. In addition, because of the business closure, the Board was unable to effect service on
the Respondents. Based on good cause shown,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, pursuant to
Rule 41(a)(2) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, this action, including all claims
herein asserted by all parties, is hereby dismissed.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
______________________________
CAROLYN C. MATTHEWS
South Carolina Administrative Law Judge
January 22, 2004
Columbia, South Carolina |