South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Edith Brown vs. SCDHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Edith Brown

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
99-ALJ-07-0031-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is before me pursuant to the Motion of the Respondent, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control ("DHEC"), to dismiss this matter on the grounds that the Petitioner's request for a contested case hearing was untimely filed. No response to the Motion to Dismiss has been filed within the proscribed time limit, as set forth under Rule 19(a) of the Rules of Procedure for the Administrative Law Judge Division. I conclude that the Motion to Dismiss must be granted and this case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The Petitioner did not file her request for a contested case hearing with the Clerk of the DHEC Board within the required thirty day period, as set forth in Section 44-7-320(B) of the South Caroline Code of Laws Ann. (Supp. 1998). Although the Petitioner sent her request for a contested case hearing to the correct street address within the thirty day period, she nonetheless addressed the letter to the wrong addressee. The request for the appeal did not reach the Clerk of the DHEC Board until January 8, 1999, well past the thirty day appeal period. Regulation 61-72 § 301 requires that the Clerk of the Board actually receive the request in order for filing to be effective. Subject matter jurisdiction did not vest with the Administrative Law Judge Division because a timely request for a contested case hearing was never effectuated. Therefore, the failure to file a request for a contested case hearing within the allowable time frame divests the Administrative Law Judge Division of jurisdiction to hear this matter. See Botany Bay Marina v. Townsend, 296 S.C. 330, 372 S.E.2d 584 (1988). Furthermore, this court has no authority to expand the time in which the request for a hearing must be filed. See Mears v. Mears, 287 S.C.





168, 337 S.E.2d 206 (1985).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case must be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.





_________________________________

RALPH KING ANDERSON, III

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

February 22, 1999

Columbia, South Carolina


 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2025 South Carolina Administrative Law Court