South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
DOR vs. Acme Retail, Inc. d/b/a Handy Pantry Store No. 64

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondent:
Acme Retail, Inc. d/b/a Handy Pantry Store No. 64
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
03-ALJ-17-0261-CC

APPEARANCES:
Dana R. Krajack, Esq.
Counsel for Regulatory Litigation
South Carolina Department of Revenue
P.O. Box 125
Columbia, SC 29214
(803) 898-5172

T. Jonathan Adams, Esq.
Attorney for the Respondent
2020 Charlotte Plaza
201 South College Street
Charlotte, NC 28244-2020
(704) 344-1117
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF SETTLEMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is before the Court based on the issuance by the South Carolina Department of Revenue (hereinafter “Department”) of a citation, SLED Case No. 54-03-0207, and a Final Department Determination to the Respondent, Acme Retail, Inc. d/b/a Handy Pantry Store No. 64 (hereinafter “Respondent”) for an alleged violation of 23 S.C. Code Ann. Reg. 7-9(B)(Supp. 2002), which occurred upon the licensed premises of the Respondent on January 30, 2003. Respondents appealed the Department’s Final Determination and requested a contested case hearing to review the violation charged and the penalty which is sought to be imposed by the Department.

I find that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. §§61-260; 12-60-1310; and 12-60-1320.

Based upon the representations of the parties’ respective attorneys, both of whom are competent counsel, it further appears that the Department and the Respondent have resolved all issued in this case without the necessity of a hearing. Their resolution is incorporated into this Order.

1.The Respondent hereby agrees to the suspension of it’s Off-premise Beer/Wine Permit, No. 32003290-PBG, for a period of ten (10) days, beginning September 15, 2003 and continuing through September 24, 2003; and

2.The Respondent agrees to immediately remit the sum of Two thousand five hundred and no ($2,500) Dollars, upon execution of this Agreement, payable to the South Carolina Department of Revenue; and

3.The Respondent acknowledges and agrees that this violation shall constitute a “knowing” violation for purposes of any enhanced penalty provisions under S.C. Rev. Ruling 95-7; and

4.The Respondent understands and agrees that this settlement and agreement does not affect or resolve any additional or future violations of the Alcohol Beverage Control Act or any other provisions, responsibilities, or liabilities which the Respondent may have under South Carolina law which are not the subject of this agreement and settlement; and.

5. The Respondent further agrees and understands that any additional violations of any provisions of the South Carolina laws and regulations regarding the sale of beer and/or wine may result in the temporary suspension or permanent revocation of its beer and wine permit, or such other action as the Department is authorized to take and as it deems appropriate.

6. The Department agrees that as it pertains to the above-captioned matter, as set forth hereinabove, that this agreement constitutes the full and final resolution of this matter by and between the Department and the Respondent and is entered by the Department under the authority granted to it under S. C. Code Ann. Section 12-4-320(3) (Supp. 2000).

Based upon the foregoing, I find the agreement and settlement between the Department and the Respondent to be fair and equitable, and I hereby approve the agreement, and hereby adopt and merge the terms thereof with this Order.

It is further Orderd that this matter be, and is hereby, dismissed. AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________________

Ray N. Stevens, Administrative Law Judge

Dated this 22nd day of August, 2003


 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2025 South Carolina Administrative Law Court