South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Roger Syntell Legette, #243366 vs. SCDOC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Corrections

PARTIES:
Appellant:
Roger Syntell Legette, #243366

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
00-ALJ-04-00341-AP

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

This matter is before the Administrative Law Judge Division ("Division") pursuant to Appellant's Notice of Appeal. In this case, Appellant asserted that an officer assaulted him by brandishing a knife in a threatening manner. Appellant requested a formal written apology from the officer. Respondent refused Appellant's request, explaining corrective action was taken concerning the incident that occurred with the officer and the officer no longer worked for Respondent.

Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss on August 7, 2000. Respondent asserts Appellant's claim does not amount to a substantial grievance.

The right of appeal is accorded only to an aggrieved party. Wilson v. Southern Ry., Carolina Div., 123 S.C. 399, 115 S.E. 764 (1923). An aggrieved party is a person who is aggrieved by a judgment when it operates on his rights of property or bears directly upon his interest. Bivens v. Knight, 254 S.C. 10, 173 S.E.2d 150 (1970). The word "aggrieved" refers to a substantial grievance such as the denial of the party's personal or property right or the imposition on the party of a burden or obligation. Id.

In this case, Respondent's refusal to require the officer to issue a formal written apology is not a denial of Appellant's personal or property rights or the imposition on Appellant of a burden or obligation. Appellant, therefore, is not aggrieved so as to permit this matter to go forward.

Based on the decision that Appellant is not substantially aggrieved, I will not address Respondent's additional argument that Appellant's claim is moot because the officer no longer works at the institution.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is granted and this appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.





__________________________________

MARVIN F. KITTRELL

Chief Administrative Law Judge



August 15, 2000

Columbia, South Carolina





APPEAL RIGHTS



You are entitled to appeal this final order of the Administrative Law Judge Division by filing a petition for judicial review in circuit court and serving such petition on opposing parties within thirty (30) days after receipt of this order. S.C. Code Ann. § 1-23-610 (Supp. 1999). The petition may be filed in any circuit court as long as the chosen forum is neither arbitrary nor unreasonable, and provided that no statute controls venue in a particular type of case. The review of the administrative law judge's order must be confined to the record. The reviewing tribunal may affirm the decision or remand the case for further proceedings; or it may reverse or modify the decision if the substantive rights of the petitioner have been prejudiced because the finding, conclusion, or decision is: (a) in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions; (b) in excess of the statutory authority of the agency; (c) made upon unlawful procedure; (d) affected by other error of law; (e) clearly erroneous in view of the reliable, probative and substantial evidence on the whole record; or (f) arbitrary or capricious or characterized by abuse of discretion or clearly unwarranted exercise of discretion.


 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2025 South Carolina Administrative Law Court