South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company vs. SCDOI

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Insurance

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Insurance and Philip S. Porter, Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
99-ALJ-09-0317-CC

APPEARANCES:
Thomas C. Salane, Esquire T. Douglas Concannon, Esquire
Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney Associate General Counsel

Hana Pokorna-Williamson, Esquire
Staff Attorney
South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER

1. On June 16, 1999, Philip S. Porter, Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina (the Consumer Advocate) requested the South Carolina Department of Insurance (the Department) to initiate a public hearing on the filing of Auto-Owners Insurance Company (the Company) requesting an approval of an increase of +2.0% in its homeowners insurance rates.



2. On June 22, 1999, the Department filed with the Administrative Law Judge Division an Agency Transmittal Form requesting a public hearing.



3. The Administrative Law Judge Division assigned this matter to Honorable John D. Geathers under the Docket No. 99-ALJ-09-0317-CC. The hearing on the matter has been scheduled for September 10, 1999 at 2:00 P.M.



4. Meanwhile, the Consumer Advocate requested additional information from the Company. Subsequent discussions between the Company and the Consumer Advocate allayed the Consumer Advocate's original concerns about this filing, in particular with respect to issues of profit and application of trending methodology.



5. Because of the additional information and clarifications provided by the Company, the Consumer Advocate no longer believes that the filing will result in rates that are excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory, and now withdraws his original request for a hearing in this matter.





6. There are no unresolved issues remaining; therefore, all parties agree to the dismissal of this matter.



NOW, THEREFORE, the above referenced matter is dismissed.





IT IS SO ORDERED.





______________________________

JOHN D. GEATHERS

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE



September 8, 1999

Columbia, South Carolina





WE CONSENT:







_____________________________ ______________________________

Thomas C. Salane, Esquire T. Douglas Concannon, Esquire

Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney Associate General Counsel

P.O. Box 1473 South Carolina Department

Columbia, SC 29202 of Insurance

Counsel for the Petitioner P.O. Box 100105

Columbia, SC 29202-6160





_____________________________

Hana Pokorna-Williamson, Esquire

Staff Attorney

South Carolina Department of

Consumer Affairs

P.O. Box 5757

Columbia, SC 29250-5757


 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2025 South Carolina Administrative Law Court