South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDHEC vs. Courtlyn House

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

Respondents:
Courtlyn House
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
06-ALJ-07-0763-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In the above-captioned matter, Respondent Courtlyn House, a community residential care facility in Eastover, South Carolina, requested a contested case hearing before this Court to challenge the decision of Petitioner South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (Department) to revoke its license to operate the facility because of its failure to bring the facility into compliance with fire and life safety standards by installing a sprinkler system. In its request for a contested case hearing, Respondent requested that this Court rescind the Department’s revocation because a sprinkler system has now been installed at the facility. On November 8, 2006, the Department filed a Motion to Dismiss this matter as moot, because it had decided to cease its action to revoke Respondent’s license as a result of the installation of the sprinkler system. Respondent did not file a response to this motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Department’s motion to dismiss this case as moot is hereby granted.

On the question of mootness, the South Carolina Supreme Court has stated:

[Courts] will not pass on moot and academic questions or make an adjudication where there remains no actual controversy. A case becomes moot when judgment, if rendered, will have no practical legal effect upon [an] existing controversy. This is true when some event occurs making it impossible for [a] reviewing [c]ourt to grant effectual relief.

 

Jones v. Dillon-Marion Human Res. Dev. Comm’n, 277 S.C. 533, 536, 291 S.E.2d 195, 196 (1982); see also Byrd v. Irmo High School, 321 S.C. 426, 468 S.E.2d 861 (1996) (same). Such is the case here. By deciding to terminate its action to revoke Respondent’s license because Respondent has installed the required sprinkler system, the Department has granted Respondent the relief it requests in this matter and thereby rendered this case moot.

Therefore, as this matter is moot,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Department’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

______________________________

JOHN D. GEATHERS

Administrative Law Judge

1205 Pendleton Street, Suite 224

Columbia, South Carolina 29201-3731

 

November 29, 2006

Columbia, South Carolina

 


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court