South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
DOR vs. Static Entertainment Corporation, d/b/a Static Night Club

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondent:
Static Entertainment Corporation, d/b/a Static Night Club
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
04-ALJ-17-0104-CC

APPEARANCES:
For the Department of Revenue: M. Anne Pearce, Esquire

For the Respondent: No Appearance
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter comes before the Administrative Law Court (ALC or Court) Footnote pursuant to

S.C. Code Ann. §§ 1-23-310 et seq. (1986 & Supp. 2003) and S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-2-20 and 61-2-260 (Supp. 2003) for a contested case hearing. The Department of Revenue (Department) is seeking revocation of the Respondent’s on-premise beer and wine permit and sale and consumption (minibottle) license for its location known as Static Night Club in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. A hearing was held on April 28, 2004 at the offices of the ALC in Columbia, South Carolina. The Respondent, after receiving timely notice from the Court, did not appear at the hearing and did not notify the Court that he would not be appearing. The Department was present at the hearing with counsel and witnesses.

After waiting approximately fifteen (15) minutes for the Respondent to appear, the Court commenced this hearing. Upon Motion of the Department, the Court then dismissed this action with prejudice under Administrative Law Court Rule 23. Rule 23 provides:

The administrative law judge may dismiss a contested case or dispose of a contested case adverse to the defaulting party. A default occurs when a party fails to plead or otherwise prosecute or defend, fails to appear at a hearing without the proper consent of the judge or fails to comply with any interlocutory order of the administrative law judge. Any non-defaulting party may move for an order dismissing the case or terminating it adversely to the defaulting party.


Because the Respondent did not appear before the Court, did not request a continuance, and has not otherwise contacted this tribunal regarding this hearing as of the issuance of this Order,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the relief sought by the Department in this matter is GRANTED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



_______________________________

Ralph King Anderson, III

Administrative Law Judge



April 28, 2004

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court