South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
John Wayland Carter, d/b/a Tobacco Shop vs. SCDOR

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondents:
John Wayland Carter, d/b/a Tobacco Shop
1603 Hampton Street, Walterboro, South Carolina
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
06-ALJ-17-0313-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT AGREEMENT

The South Carolina Department of Revenue (Department) initiated this matter by issuing a Final Agency Determination to John Wayland Carter, d/b/a Tobacco Shop (Respondent). Respondent holds a permit authorizing him to sell beer and wine at the location, 1603 Hampton Street, Walterboro, South Carolina (licensed premises). The Department determined that Respondent had violated S.C. Code Ann. § 61-4-580(3) by “permitting games of chance” on the licensed premises. The Department is seeking a suspension of Respondent’s beer and wine permit for this violation for a period of forty-five days.

Prior to the contested case hearing scheduled in this matter, the parties, as attested to by the parties’ undersigned signatures, have indicated that the matter has been resolved.

The parties’ agreement is upon the following terms and conditions:

1. Respondent admits the violation of Section 61-4-580(3), “permitting games of chance” on the licensed premises. (The devices seized were two Jungle Kings, two Cadillac Jacks, one Queen Bee, and three Monkeylands. The games played on these machines included Bingo and Sureshot.)

2. Respondent agrees to prohibit any gambling machines/devices or any similar machines, games, or devices prohibited by S.C. Code Ann. § 12-21-2710 or any activity that constitutes gambling or a game of chance upon the licensed premises in the future (from the date of this signed Order).

3. The Department agrees to waive all penalties for the present violation, except in the event Respondent violates the provisions of this Agreement. Therefore, in the event a subsequent violation, other than a violation of this Agreement, occurs within three years from the date of March 15, 2005, on the licensed premises, such violation, for enhanced penalty purposes, will be considered in accordance with the decisions rendered by the Administrative Law Court in the cases of S.C. Dep’t of Revenue v. John Wayland Carter, Docket Nos. 05-ALJ-17-0467-CC and 05-ALJ-17-0468-CC (that is, if the Administrative Law Court sustains the violations at issue in those cases, a subsequent violation, other than a violation of this Agreement, will be considered a third violation). However, should Respondent violate this Agreement by committing a future violation of Sections 61-4-580(3) or 61-4-580(5) by permitting an act that constitutes a crime as set forth in Section 12-21-2710, or any other game of chance or gambling violation, within three years of March 15, 2005, such violation will result in the revocation of all alcohol permits and licenses held by Respondent for the licensed premises pursuant to the authority granted the Department in S.C. Code Ann. §§ 61-2-70 and 61-2-80 (Supp. 2005). Such revocation(s) will remain in effect for three years from the date of the violation resulting in such revocation.

4. Respondent understands and agrees that this settlement does not affect or resolve any additional pending or future violations of Titles 12 or 61 of the South Carolina Code of Laws or the regulations thereunder not specifically referred to in this Agreement or any other provisions, responsibilities, or liabilities which Respondent has under South Carolina law.

5. This Agreement and Order constitutes the final resolution of the issues stated herein between the parties.

The parties further agree that they freely and voluntarily entered into this Agreement and such constitutes the full and final resolution of this matter.

I find this Agreement to be fair and equitable, approve such agreement, and hereby order its adoption. This Court retains continuing jurisdiction to enforce this Order. As Respondent no longer requires a hearing on this matter, I also Order this matter RESOLVED WITH PREJUDICE.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

JOHN D. GEATHERS

Administrative Law Judge

October 18, 2006

Columbia, South Carolina

WE SO CONSENT:

s/Carol I. McMahan____________ s/James M. Griffin_____________

Carol I. McMahan, Esq. James M. Griffin, Esq.

South Carolina Department Attorney for John Wayland Carter,

of Revenue d/b/a Tobacco Shop

October 16__, 2006 Oct. 10___, 2006


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court