ORDERS:
ORDER
A hearing was held in this contested matter on April 4, 2000, at the Administrative Law Judge Division (ALJD or Division)
in Columbia, South Carolina. The ALJD made an oral ruling from the bench dismissing this matter setting forth that because
the Petitioner did not present any evidence in this case, that the matter be dismissed. Thereafter, on April 11, 2000, the
Petitioner filed a Motion to Reinstate which this Division is now treating as a Motion for Reconsideration.
Administrative Law Judge Division Rule 29 (C)(1) sets forth that "[a]ny party may move for reconsideration of a final
decision of an administrative law judge in a contested case, subject to the grounds for relief set forth in Rule 60(B)(1 through
5), SCRCP . . . ." The Final Decision issued by this Court in the above matter was supported by the preponderance of the
credible evidence and by the statutory and case law of South Carolina. Furthermore, the Petitioner has not established any
ground pursuant to SCRCP 60(B) to warrant reconsideration of this case.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration is denied.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
_____________________________
Ralph King Anderson, III
Administrative Law Judge
May 15, 2000
Columbia, South Carolina |