ORDERS:
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Pursuant to this tribunal's order of August 14, 1997, each party was required to file a
prehearing statement with the Administrative Law Judge Division and serve all parties within
fifteen ( l 5) days of the date of the order. However, Respondent has not responded to this
tribunal's order for a preheating statement or to a letter from this tribunal dated September
15,1997, requesting the filing of a preheating statement by September 26, 1997. Pursuant to
ALJD Rule 23, this matter is hereby dismissed. This Rule provides:
The administrative law judge may dismiss a contested case or dispose of a contested case
adverse to the defaulting party. A default occurs when a party fails to respond or
otherwise prosecute or defend, fails to appear at a hearing without the proper consent of
the judge or fails to comply with any interlocutory order of the administrative law judge.
Any non-defaulting party may move for an order dismissing the case or terminating it
adversely to the defaulting party.
ALJD Rule 23 (1997) (emphasis added).
By virtue of the Respondent's request for a contested case, he has an obligation to defend
his position. Respondent has not requested an extension or enlargement of time pursuant to
ALJD Rule 3B to comply with this tribunal's order, but rather has been unresponsive to all
communications. Respondent has been given abundant opportunity to comply. "There is a limit
beyond which the court should not allow a litigant to consume the time of the court ...."
Georganne Apparel. Inc. v. Todd, 303 S.C. 87, 92, 399 S.E.2d 16, 19 (Ct. App. 1990).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed and
the Respondent is subject to the penalty or penalties imposed in this matter.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
JOHN D. GEATHERS
Administrative Law Judge
Post Office Box 11667
Columbia, South Carolina 29211-1677
September 29, 1997
Columbia, South Carolina |