ORDERS:
CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL
This matter is before the Court based on the issuance of an Administrative Violation and the South Carolina Department of
Revenue's ("Department") Final Determination to Respondent Charleston T & T, Inc., d/b/a Charleston T & T (213 East Bay Street,
Charleston, South Carolina) citing a violation of 23 S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 7-9(B) which occurred on or about January 7, 2000.
Respondent appealed the Department's Determination, seeking review of the violation charged and the penalties imposed.
At the call of the case, the Department and the Respondent informed the Court that all matters in issue were resolved without the
necessity of a hearing. Their resolution is incorporated in this Order.
1. The Respondent admits the violation; consents to a thirty (30) day suspension of
its beer and wine permit; and agrees to pay a penalty in the amount of One Thousand
and no/l00 ($1,000.00) Dollars. The thirty day suspension commences on January
15, 2001, and runs through February 13, 2001, with the first day of suspension being
the day of mailing, or surrender, of the beer and wine permit to the Department of
Revenue. The monetary penalty is due January 15, 2001.
2. The parties further agree that as it pertains to the above-captioned case, this constitutes the full and final resolution of this matter
between the Department and
Respondent.
3. Accordingly, the Respondent has withdrawn its request for a contested case hearing.
I find the agreement between the Department and Respondents to be fair and equitable, approve the agreement, and hereby Order its
adoption. The Court retains continuing jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Order. Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing,
this case is dismissed.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
_____________________________
RAY N. STEVENS
Administrative Law Judge
This 15th day of December, 2000
Columbia, South Carolina
WE SO CONSENT: WE SO CONSENT:
SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON T & T, INC., D/B/A
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHARLESTON T & T
Michael K. Kendree W. Tracy Brown
Counsel for Regulatory Litigation Counsel for Respondent |
