ORDERS:
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
On December 8, 1999, an Order was issued to all parties requiring the filing of Prehearing Statements within fifteen (15)
days of that Order. Given the additional five (5) day extension allowed for mailing under ALJD Rule 5(c), the Prehearing
Statements were due on December 28, 1999. The Petitioner failed to file the Prehearing Statement.
On February 2, 2000, the Petitioner was again directed to file the Prehearing Statement on or before February 12, 2000. No
Prehearing Statement was received by the close of business on the extension date of February 12, 2000, and thus Petitioner
failed to comply with the Order.
Upon a party's failure to defend an action or upon a failure to adhere to an interlocutory order, the Administrative Law
Judge may dismiss a contested case in a manner so as to uphold the position of the party in compliance. ALJD Rule 23.
Therefore, IT IS ORDERED:
1. Due to the Petitioner's failure to defend this action, the Petitioner is in default.
2. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management,
having complied in this matter, is not in default.
3. As a result of the default, the case is dismissed and the action is ended.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
CAROLYN C. MATTHEWS
Administrative Law Judge
February 22, 2000
Columbia, South Carolina. |