South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDHEC vs. Ronald F. Johnson

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management

Respondent:
Ronald F. Johnson
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
95-ALJ-07-0748-CC

APPEARANCES:
John P. Kassebaum
Attorney for Petitioner

John C. Land, IV
Attorney for Respondent
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is before the Court pursuant to a Petition for Review timely served by Ronald F. Johnson ("Respondent") seeking review of an Enforcement Order issued by the S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (Petitioner" or "OCRM"). A pre-trial conference took place February 23, 1996, at the Administrative Law Judge Division with the Court, Respondent and Counsel for Petitioner. Following the pre-trial conference, a contested case hearing was set for April 4, 1996, and continued until April 9, 1996. Prior to the date set for trial of the issues, the parties notified the Court that an agreement had been reached resolving the dispute which had given rise to the appeal. This Consent Order has been provided to the Court by the parties and represents their agreement as to the facts in issue and the proper resolution of the appeal. Accordingly, this Court finds as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Respondent owns property abutting the beach/dune critical area located at 1502 North Waccamaw Drive, Garden City Beach, Horry County, South Carolina.

2. A portion of the habitable structure on Respondent's property is located seaward of the 40 year set-back line.

3. Respondent applied for and received General Permit, GP90-E-725, which authorized the construction of a deck not to exceed 144 square feet seaward of and abutting the habitable structure at the above location.

4. In addition to the authorized construction approximately 324 square feet of additional decking has been constructed seaward of Respondents habitable structure.

5. The variances from the specifications and conditions of General Permit, GP90-E-725, and the construction of the additional decking have not been permitted or otherwise legally authorized by OCRM as required by law.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and issues pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 1 -23-600 (Supp. 1995).

2. S.C. Code Ann. § 48-39-10 et seq. grants OCRM jurisdiction over construction activities seaward of the setback line.

3. Respondent, Ronald F. Johnson, is in violation of S.C. Code § 48-39-290, and Regulation 30-13(C), for the above referenced construction in the beach/dune critical area without authorization from OCRM.

4. Respondent's violations subject him to the assessment of civil penalties as authorized by S.C. Code Ann. § 48-39-170(C).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to S.C. Code § 48-39-170(C), and with the consent of the parties, that:

1. Respondent will comply with all specifications of General Permit, GP90-E 725, and remove all unauthorized construction from the beach/dune critical area as follows:.

a. Remove all the wood decking measuring 3'9" by 21' running parallel to the ocean and located adjacent to the concrete foundation.

b. Remove all but a 6' by 6' portion of the wood decking measuring 10'9" by 11' located underneath the stairs and adjacent to the concrete foundation.

c. Remove the elevated deck associated with the stairs running from the screen porch to the ground so that the turn-around is no wider than the width of the existing stairs.

d. Remove all that portion of the not-attached deck with roof located seaward of the baseline which exceeds 61 square feet.

2. The above described activity will be completed within 45 days of the date of execution of the Order.

3. Within thirty (30) days of the execution of this Order Respondent shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of one thousand ($1,000) dollars to OCRM.

4. Enforcement Order 95M-001C is hereby dismissed.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



__________________________

Alison Renee Lee

Administrative Law Judge



April ____, 1996


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court