South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Marshall G. Floyd, d/b/a Happy Misfits vs. SCDOR

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Marshall G. Floyd, d/b/a Happy Misfits

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Revenue
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
94-ALJ-17-0336-CC

APPEARANCES:
For the Petitioners: unrepresented

For the Respondent/South Carolina Department of Revenue and Taxation: Nicholas P. Sipe, Esquire
 

ORDERS:

ORDER AND DECISION

STATEMENT OF THE CASE


This matter comes before the Administrative Law Judge Division pursuant to an application for a beer and wine permit and sale and consumption license by Marshall G. Floyd, d/b/a Happy Misfits. The South Carolina Department of Revenue and Taxation denied Mr. Floyd's application as it did not appear that Marshall G. Floyd met the requirements of S.C. Code Ann. § 61-3-425 (Supp. 1993), as Mr. Floyd owed delinquent taxes to the Federal Government.

The Petitioner made a timely request for a hearing, and a hearing was held before the Administrative Law Judge Division in Anderson, South Carolina, on December 20, 1994, concerning this matter. Notice of the time, date, place and nature of the hearing was timely served upon all parties of interest. Petitioner did not appear at the hearing, and the Court did not give prior consent to his absence. Petitioner's applications for a retail permit to sell beer and wine and license to sell mini-bottles are denied.



SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE

On September 8, 1994, Marshall G. Floyd filed with the South Carolina Department of Revenue and Taxation applications for a retail permit to sell beer and wine and a sale and consumption (mini-bottle) license. On September 13, 1994, the Department notified Mr. Floyd that it had been provided information indicating that Mr. Floyd had an outstanding tax liability with the federal government and informed him how to resolve this matter. On September 21, 1994, Mr. Floyd requested a hearing. Marshall G. Floyd, nor anyone on his behalf, appeared at the scheduled hearing. The Department made a timely motion to deny Mr. Floyd's applications under Temporary Operating Procedures Rule 23.



FINDINGS OF FACT


By a preponderance of the evidence, I make the following findings:

1. This Division has personal and subject matter jurisdiction.

2. The applicant is seeking an on-premise beer and wine permit and a sale and consumption ("mini-bottle") license located at 4920 Highway 24, Anderson, Anderson County, South Carolina.

3. The applicant was informed by the Respondent that it could not approve his applications due to his outstanding tax liability to the federal government, and was informed how to resolve that liability.

4. The Department made a timely motion to deny the applications of Marshall G. Floyd under Temporary Operating Procedures Rule 23.



CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact, I conclude as a matter of law, the following:

1. S.C. Code Ann. § 1-23-600 (Supp. 1993) grants jurisdiction to the Administrative Law Judge Division to hear contested cases under the Administrative Procedures Act.

2. S.C. Code Ann. § 61-1-55 (Supp. 1993) grants to the Administrative Law Judge Division the powers, duties and responsibilities as a hearing officer in protested and contested matters governing alcoholic beverages, beer and wine.

3. S.C. Ann. § 61-3-425 (Supp. 1993) prohibits the issuance of a license or permit under Title 61 unless the South Carolina Department of Revenue and Taxation and the Internal Revenue Service determine that the applicant does not owe any delinquent taxes.



ORDER

Based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, It is hereby:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the applications of Marshall G. Floyd are denied.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________________

Marvin F. Kittrell

Chief Administrative Law Judge

Columbia, South Carolina

January 10, 1994


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court