South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Cynthia Hughes and C.A. Hughes, Inc. vs. SCDOR

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Cynthia Hughes and C.A. Hughes, Inc.

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Revenue
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
94-ALJ-17-0092-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

AMENDED ORDER AND DECISION

This matter came before the Administrative Law Judge Division upon the application of Cynthia Hughes on behalf of C.A. Hughes, Inc. for an on-premises beer and wine permit for the Castles located at 408-6 Duncan Bypass, Union, South Carolina. After notice to all the parties, a hearing was conducted on June 8, 1994. The file of the Department of Revenue and Taxation was made a part of the record. An objection was raised to the form letters signed by numerous people as petition letters. This objection will be addressed in the Findings of Fact. A copy of the file is substituted for the original. Based upon the preponderance of the testimony and evidence presented, I make the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The applicant, Cynthia A. Hughes, is over the age of twenty-one and has been a resident of South Carolina all of her life. She is the president and sole shareholder of C.A. Hughes, Inc. She is a person of good moral character and has never been convicted of a crime. There are five applications for on-premises beer and wine permits, some of which may still be pending. At the time of the hearing, she did not hold any permits from the Department and has never had any permits suspended or revoked.

2. C.A. Hughes, Inc. owns and/or leases property from which it plans to operate several deli type restaurants. Castles is currently a snack bar and gameroom but also sells light groceries. Handmade crafts also are available for sale. The applicant plans to remodel the location to make it a deli with eating areas. The hours of operation are 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., Monday through Saturday. The location is in a bi-level strip shopping mall. The mall has an upper level from which access is gained on the street level in the front. In the rear of the mall is the lower level created by the slope in the terrain. The mall has commercial business oriented establishments. Castles is located on the lower level. Ample parking is available to any patrons.

3. Castles will employ three people on a full time basis and at least one person part time. These employees will be trained regarding the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages including beer and wine. Written procedures and guidelines will be developed to ensure that the employees follow the law.

4. Duncan Bypass is a commercial area leading to Spartanburg. There are several shopping malls in the area which include a Winn-Dixie, a Mexican restaurant, Wal-Mart, Bi-Lo, a Japanese restaurant and other stores. There are several churches all located within two-tenths to four-tenths of a mile from the location. None of the churches submitted any protest to the proposed location. There are no schools or playgrounds in the vicinity. The city police department is 1.5 miles away. The police regularly patrol the shopping center where Castles is located. Residents in the area are shielded by a natural wooded buffer zone and a creek. Access to this area is from the main highway and not by any back streets or cross streets.

5. Notice of the application was published in the Union Daily Times and posted on the premises for the time period prescribed by law.

6. Numerous letters were signed by people and mailed to the department to protest this application. With the exception of one letter written by a resident, all of the letters were from the businesses located within the strip mall where Castles is located. The objection by the applicant was that there was no method to determine whether the letters were signed by patrons of the businesses or by the employees of the businesses. In fact some appeared to be signed by persons listing their business as "retired". The objection raised is a valid one and based upon the fact that no one appeared at the hearing to testify concerning the protests after notice had been given, the letters are not allowed. In addition, because the protestants failed to appear the protests submitted to the Department are considered abandoned.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. The Administrative Law Judge Division is vested with the powers, duties and responsibilities exercised by the former Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission and hearing officers pursuant to Chapter 23 of Title 1. S.C. Code of Laws § 61-1-55 (Supp. 1993).

2. S.C. Code § 61-9-320 (Supp. 1993) provides eight statutory requirements for this issuance of beer and wine permits. The applicant meets all eight of the criteria.

3. The applicant meets the statutory requirements for the issuance of an on-premises retail beer and wine license. The location is a suitable one. It is located in a commercial area of Union on the Duncan Bypass where there are several shopping malls, restaurants and other businesses. It is not in close proximity to any churches, schools or playgrounds. The corporation will develop a training program and enforcement policy regarding the sale of alcoholic beverages. There is adequate police protection.

ORDER

Based upon the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is

ORDERED, that the applicant, Cynthia A. Hughes and C.A. Hughes, Inc. are entitled to the issuance of an on-premises retail beer and wine permit for Castles located on the Duncan Bypass in Union. The Department shall issue the permit upon the payment of the appropriate fees.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________________

ALISON RENEE LEE

Administrative Law Judge



August __, 1994

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court