South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Employers Insurance of Wausau vs. SCDOI

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Insurance

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Employers Insurance of Wausau

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Insurance and Philip S. Porter, Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
02-ALJ-09-0066-CC

APPEARANCES:
Mary K. Seidl T. Douglas Concannon, Esquire
Counsel Associate General Counsel
Wausau Insurance Companies South Carolina Department

Hana Pokorna-Williamson, Esquire
Staff Attorney
South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL

1. On February 12, 2002, Philip S. Porter, Consumer Advocate for the State of South Carolina (the Consumer Advocate) requested the South Carolina Department of Insurance (the Department) to initiate a public hearing on the filing of Employers Insurance of Wausau (the Company) requesting an approval of an overall increase of +15.9% in its workers compensation insurance premium rates.



2. On February 19, 2002, the Department filed with the Administrative Law Judge Division an Agency Transmittal Form requesting a public hearing.



3. The Administrative Law Judge Division assigned this matter to the Honorable Ray N. Stevens under Docket No. 02-ALJ-09-0066-CC. In the week of April 1, 2002, the Consumer Advocate notified the office of the Honorable Ray N. Stevens that all of the issues between him and the Company have been resolved. A hearing date on the matter has not yet been set.



4. In February, the Consumer Advocate retained a consulting actuary and subsequently requested additional information from the Company primarily consisting of information regarding historical loss development and trend data used to develop Ultimate Loss Ratio.



5. Having reviewed this additional information, the Consumer Advocate no longer opposes the Petitioner's rate request.



6. Based on the foregoing, the Consumer Advocate now withdraws his original request for a hearing in this matter.



7. There are no unresolved issues remaining; therefore, all parties agree to the dismissal of this matter.



NOW, THEREFORE, the above referenced matter is dismissed.





IT IS SO ORDERED.



______________________________

RAY N. STEVENS

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE



April 18th, 2002

Columbia, South Carolina





WE CONSENT:



_____________________________ ______________________________

Mary K. Seidl T. Douglas Concannon, Esquire

Counsel Associate General Counsel

Wausau Insurance Companies South Carolina Department

Wausau Corporate legal - WAU1230 of Insurance

P.O. Box 8017 P.O. Box 100105

Wausau, WI 54402-8017 Columbia, SC 29202-6160



_____________________________

Hana Pokorna-Williamson, Esquire

Staff Attorney

South Carolina Department of

Consumer Affairs

P.O. Box 5757

Columbia, SC 29250-5757


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court