South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
DOR vs. The Pantry Inc., d/b/a The Depot No. 3290

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

Respondent:
The Pantry Inc., d/b/a The Depot No. 3290
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
02-ALJ-17-0348-CC

APPEARANCES:
Carol I. McMahan
Counsel for Regulatory Litigation

Walter B. Todd, Jr.
Attorney for Respondent
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT AGREEMENT

The South Carolina Department of Revenue (Department) initiated this matter by issuing a finding that The Pantry Inc., d/b/a The Depot No. 3290, located at1460 W.P. Ezell Blvd., Spartanburg, South Carolina, had violated 23 S.C.Code Ann. Regulation 7-9(B)(Supp. 2002), by “permitting the purchase of beer by a person under the age of twenty-one.” Prior to a hearing on this matter, the parties resolved the matter. That agreement is incorporated into this consent order as set forth below.

1.The Pantry Inc. admits that on April 26, 2002, it permitted a person under the age of twenty-one purchase beer from its licensed location at 1460 W. P. Ezell Blvd., Spartanburg, South Carolina.

2.For this violation The Pantry, Inc. agrees to serve a suspension of its beer and wine permit for the location noted in “1” for a period of one-hundred and twenty-days. This suspension will begin on Monday, April 7, 2003 and run continuously from day to day until the one-hundred and twenty day suspension has been served. Further,The Pantry, Inc. agrees that it may not sell, lease, sublease, or otherwise transfer this location prior to the completion of service of this suspension.

3.Further, The Pantry, Inc., agrees to remit a monetary fine in the amount of $1,000.00 to the Department, no later than 5:00 p.m. on April 11, 2003.

4.Further, The Pantry, Inc. agrees that prior to the completion of the one-hundred and twenty day suspension; it will provide training to its employees at this location, through the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division or other certified training provided to retailers of alcoholic beverages, on how to prevent sales to underage individuals.

5.In consideration of the above and based on the alcohol sales procedures put in place by The Pantry at this location prior to the violation of April 26, 2002, the Department accepts the suspension, fine and training in satisfaction of the violation in this matter.

The parties freely and voluntarily entered into this agreement. Further, the parties agree that this constitutes the full and final resolution of this violation and such is resolved with prejudice. Failure to comply with the specific terms set forth herein will result in the imposition of the original penalty of revocation of the beer and wine permit as provided in the Department’s Final determination dated July 18, 2002.

I find this agreement to be fair and equitable, approve such agreement, and hereby Order its adoption. This court retains continuing jurisdiction to enforce this Order. As Respondent no longer requires a hearing on this matter, I also Order this matter Resolved With Prejudice.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________________

April 21, 2003Honorable Carolyn C. Matthews

Administrative Law Judge


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court