South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Eric Albany #219848 vs. SCDOC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Corrections

PARTIES:
Appellant:
Eric Albany #219848

vs.

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
05-ALJ-04-00907-AP

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER
GRIEVANCE NO. ACI 0015-05

In the above-captioned matter, Appellant Eric Albany appeals of the decision of Respondent South Carolina Department of Corrections (Department) to deny his grievance concerning the cancellation of his organizational meeting on Christmas Day. Based upon the record presented in this appeal, I find that the Department’s decision to deny Appellant’s grievance must be affirmed.

BACKGROUND

In Step 1 and Step 2 Inmate Grievance Forms, submitted on January 7, 2005, and February 22, 2005, respectively, and identified as grievance number ACI 0015-05, Appellant contends that officials at the Allendale Correctional Institution improperly canceled a meeting of his religious organization on Christmas Day. In response to Appellant’s grievance, the Department found that officials at Allendale had not specifically canceled Appellant’s religious services, but had simply restricted all movement on Christmas except for visitation, which led to the cancellation of all organizational meetings scheduled for the day, including religious services. Therefore, by a final agency decision dated August 8, 2005, the Department denied Appellant’s grievance. Appellant now appeals that denial before this Court.

DISCUSSION

This appeal is before this Court pursuant to Al-Shabazz v. State, 338 S.C. 354, 527 S.E.2d 742 (2000), Sullivan v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 355 S.C. 437, 586 S.E.2d 124 (2003), and Slezak v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 361 S.C. 327, 605 S.E.2d 506 (2004). Having fully considered the documents filed by Appellant and the Department and having closely reviewed the record in this matter, I find that the Department’s decision to deny Appellant’s grievance was the result of a routine and good-faith exercise of the Department’s administrative responsibilities that is supported by sufficient evidence in the record. Further, there is nothing in the record to suggest that the Department’s decision was arbitrary, capricious, or the result of personal bias or prejudice. Accordingly, the Department’s decision in this matter should be affirmed.

ORDER

For the reasons set forth above,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Department’s decision to deny Appellant’s grievance is AFFIRMED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

JOHN D. GEATHERS

Administrative Law Judge

1205 Pendleton Street, Suite 224

Columbia, South Carolina 29201-3731

June 20, 2006

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court