South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCE&G, et al vs. SCDOR

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Revenue

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, South Carolina Pipeline Corporation, and South Carolina Generating Company, Inc.

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Revenue
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
04-ALJ-17-0197-CC

APPEARANCES:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Burnet R. Maybank, III, its Director

SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY
Kevin B. Marsh, its Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

SOUTH CAROLINA GENERATING COMPANY
Kevin B. Marsh, its Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

SOUTH CAROLINA PIPELINE CORPORATION
Kevin B. Marsh, its Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
 

ORDERS:

FINAL ORDER
The matter in dispute is a property tax controversy in which the Petitioners appealed their property tax assessments for years 2002 and 2003. More specifically, SCE&G and Pipeline protested the South Carolina Department of Revenue’s (Department) inclusion of right-of-way easements as taxable property for tax years 2002 and 2003. SCE&G, Pipeline, and GENCO protested the Department’s reconciliation of value for tax year 2003, claiming that the Department failed to assign proper weight to the income approach to value. Following negotiations by the parties, the parties have entered into a settlement agreement resolving both of the above-stated issues. This settlement agreement is hereby made a part of this Order and is attached hereto. I find that the provisions of the settlement agreement, including the method of assessment of the taxpayers in future years, are rational and reasonable, and I approve them. I hold that the parties have the power and authority to enter into the settlement agreement, including its provisions concerning the method of assessment of the taxpayers in future years, and I hold that the agreement is valid, enforceable, and binding on the parties.

Based on the consent of the parties, as evidenced by the signatures of the parties below, it is the order of this Court that this matter is forever ended and dismissed with

prejudice to all parties to this suit, as well as those parties in privity to such parties.

Marvin F. Kittrell

Chief Administrative Law Judge


Columbia, South Carolina

March 16, 2005


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court