South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Leonard O. Henry vs. SCBCB

AGENCY:
South Carolina Budget and Control Board

PARTIES:
Appellant:
Leonard O. Henry

Respondents:
South Carolina Budget and Control Board, Employee Insurance Program
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
08-ALJ-30-0215-AP

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is before the Administrative Law Court (“ALC”) pursuant to a Notice of Appeal filed by Leonard O. Henry (“Henry”) on April 17, 2008. Henry appeals the decision of the South Carolina Budget and Control Board, Employee Insurance Program (“EIP”) closing his claim for basic long-term disability (“BLTD”) benefits under the State of South Carolina’s Basic Long Term Disability Income Benefit Plan (“Plan”). By letter dated March 19, 2008, EIP’s Long Term Disability Appeals Committee (“Appeals Committee”) informed Henry that he no longer qualified for continued disability income benefits under the terms and conditions of the Plan.

On appeal, Henry raises three issues, but they all relate to the Supplemental Long Term Disability Plan (“SLTD Plan”),[1] not the BLTD Plan. On August 6, 2008, EIP filed a motion to dismiss this appeal based on the fact that the ALC does not have subject matter jurisdiction over Henry’s appeal. Upon consideration of the parties’ filings and the Record on Appeal, the court finds that this appeal should be dismissed.

The ALC, like other administrative agencies, is a creature of statute and, as such, possesses only the authority and jurisdiction expressly provided to it by constitutional and statutory provisions. See S.C. Code Ann. § 1-23-500 et seq. (2005 & Supp. 2007); see also Mungo v. Smith, 289 S.C. 560, 564, 347 S.E.2d 514, 517 (Ct. App. 1986); Calhoun Life Ins. Co. v. Gambrell, 245 S.C. 406, 140 S.E.2d 774 (1965). S.C. Code Ann. § 1-11-710(C) provides:

Notwithstanding Sections 1-23-310 and 1-23-320 or any other provision of law, claims for benefits under any self-insured plan of insurance offered by the State to state and public school district employees and other eligible individuals must be resolved by procedures established by the board, which shall constitute the exclusive remedy for these claims, subject only to appellate judicial review consistent with the standards provided in Section 1-23-380.

S.C. Code Ann. § 1-11-710(C) (emphasis added). This provision, along with § 1-23-600(D) (as amended by 2008 S.C. Act No. 334),[2] provides for judicial review of claims involving self-insured plans by the ALC in its appellate capacity. However, there is no authority granting the ALC appellate jurisdiction over claims arising from plans that are not insured by the State of South Carolina.

In the present appeal, there is no dispute that the BLTD Plan is a state-sponsored, self-insured plan that is administered by Standard Insurance Company. EIP argues, however, that the SLTD Plan, while state-sponsored, is not funded by the state and, therefore, any challenges to this plan are not properly before the ALC.

The Record on Appeal shows that the SLTD Plan is underwritten by Standard Insurance Company and is not funded by the State of South Carolina. (R. at 00077; compare R. at 00050 (SLTD Policy) with R. at 00002 (BLTD Policy)). Moreover, the terms of the SLTD Plan contain a procedure for claims review which states that a claimant may request review by Standard of a denial within sixty days after receipt of the denial. (See R. at 00050, 00070, 00072.) No other review procedures are provided for under the SLTD Plan. In contrast, the BLTD Plan states that a claimant may request review within six months after receiving notice of the denial from the claims administrator and further provides that, upon receipt of that decision, a claimant may request a final review from EIP. (See R. at 00020.)

In the instant appeal, Henry raises issues relating solely to the SLTD Plan. The SLTD Plan is not a “self-insured plan” subject to § 1-11-710(C). Therefore, this court does not have jurisdiction to review the issues raised in Henry’s appeal. It is therefore

ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED.


IT IS SO ORDERED.

PAIGE J. GOSSETT

Administrative Law Judge

September 25, 2008

Columbia, South Carolina



[1] The SLTD Plan is a separate optional plan that state employees may join to provide coverage in addition to the BLTD Plan.

[2] The Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”) was amended and renumbered via 2008 S.C. Act No. 334 (eff. June 16, 2008).


~/pdf/080215.pdf
PDF

Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court