South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Ed Ruffin, Jr. vs. SCDCB

AGENCY:
South Carolina Budget and Control Board

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Ed Ruffin, Jr.

Respondents:
South Carolina Budget and Control Board, South Carolina Retirement Systems
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
08-ALJ-30-0124-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL

In the above-captioned matter, Petitioner Ed Ruffin requested a contested case hearing to challenge the decision of Respondent South Carolina Budget and Control Board, South Carolina Retirement Systems, to deny his application for disability retirement benefits pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 9-1-1540 (Supp. 2007). The parties now come before the Court seeking the dismissal of this contested case.

At issue in this matter is the Final Agency Determination issued by the Director of the South Carolina Retirement Systems on February 21, 2008, in which the Retirement Systems denied Petitioner’s application for disability retirement benefits based upon the recommendation of Joel D. Leonard, M.Ed., CRC, CVE, an independent vocational consultant hired to review Petitioner’s claim. In making his recommendation, Mr. Leonard considered the medical records submitted to the Retirement Systems regarding Petitioner’s claim and Petitioner’s testimony at an administrative conference held by Mr. Leonard on February 14, 2008. However, during the time this case has been pending before the Court, Petitioner has submitted additional medical evidence concerning his disability claim, including, most notably, recent medical records from an outpatient neuropsychological consultation. Based upon these updated medical records and the prior medical evidence in the record, Mr. Leonard has determined that the medical evidence submitted in connection with Petitioner’s case now supports a finding that he meets the eligibility requirements for disability retirement benefits. Respondent, therefore, has made the determination to award the disability retirement benefits at issue in this matter.

THEREFORE, upon the joint motion of Charles M. Black, Jr., attorney for Petitioner, and Justin R. Werner, attorney for Respondent,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the settlement reached by the parties, this matter is DISMISSED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

Honorable Paige J. Gossett

Administrative Law Judge

June 2, 2008

Columbia, South Carolina

WE SO MOVE:

___________________________ ____________

Charles M. Black, Jr. Date

Attorney for Petitioner

____________________________ ____________

Justin R. Werner Date

Attorney for Respondent


~/pdf/080124.pdf
PDF

Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court