South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Ashley II of Charleston, LLC vs. DHEC, et al

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Ashley II of Charleston, LLC

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control and Rhodia, Inc
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
04-ALJ-07-0234-CC

APPEARANCES:
Attorneys for Ashley II of Charleston, LLC:
Ben A. Hagood, Jr., Esquire
Chaun W. Pflug , Esquire

Attorney for Rhodia, Inc:
Newman Jack Smith, Esquire

Attorney for SCDHEC:
Jessica J.O. King, Esquire
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WHEREAS, on June 16, 2004, The Bureau of Land and Waste Management of South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (“Department”) made a final decision to renew a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) Part B Hazardous Waste Permit SCD 003 358 389 (“Permit”) to Rhodia, Inc.’s Charleston Plant located in Charleston, South Carolina (“Site”).

WHEREAS, the Department’s action constituted a final permit decision for Rhodia, Inc. (“Rhodia”).

WHEREAS, on June 28, 2004, Ashley II of Charleston, LLC (“A-II”) served upon the Board of the Department a formal request for a contested hearing regarding the Permit.

WHEREAS, on July 6, 2004, the Department filed an Agency Transmittal Form and A-II’s request was transferred to the South Carolina Administrative Law Court (“Court”).

WHEREAS, A-II's challenge to the permit renewal involved the substance of the Corrective Measures Study Report, the plant’s compliance history, the safety of the operations at the Site, and the financial condition of Rhodia.

WHEREAS, in accordance with the compliance schedule set forth in the Permit, the Corrective Measures Study Report will be submitted to the Department and, upon approval by the Department, will be the subject of a future modification to the Permit.

WHEREAS, A-II reserves all rights with respect to commenting upon, challenging, and appealing any future Permit modification.

WEREAS, the parties acknowledge that A-II may, in any future Permit decisions or modifications, challenge the plant’s compliance history, the safety of the operations at the Site, and the financial condition of Rhodia.

WHEREAS, A-II, is now willing to dismiss without prejudice this current permit appeal.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 68 of the Rules of Procedure for the South Carolina Administrative Law Court, A-II, the Department, and Rhodia hereby stipulate and agree, and by signing below the Court hereby ORDERS this action be dismissed without prejudice.

SO ORDERED:

DATE: December 8, 2004________________________

Ralph King Anderson, III

Administrative Law Judge


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court