South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDCA vs. Central Trading Post and Robert H. Moore, Individually

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs

Respondents:
Central Trading Post and Robert H. Moore, Individually
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
07-ALJ-30-0498-IJ

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is before me pursuant to a request for an injunction filed by the South Carolina Department of Consumer Affairs (Department), in which the Department sought the issuance of a Cease and Desist Order and sanctions against Respondents. On November 7, 2007, I issued an Order for Prehearing Statements in which each party was given fifteen (15) days to submit their Prehearing Statement. Pursuant to that Order, the Department timely submitted its Prehearing Statement. However, the Respondent did not. Thereafter, by letter dated December 3, 2007, Respondent was granted an additional five (5) days to submit his Prehearing Statement. As of the date of this Order of Dismissal, neither Respondent nor anyone representing Respondent has filed a Prehearing Statement. Furthermore, no correspondence has been returned to the Administrative Law Court (ALC or Court).

Based on the foregoing, this action is dismissed pursuant to ALC Rule 23, with prejudice. Rule 23 provides:

The administrative law judge may dismiss a contested case or dispose of a contested case adverse to the defaulting party. A default occurs when a party fails to plead or otherwise prosecute or defend, fails to appear at a hearing without the proper consent of the judge or fails to comply with any interlocutory order of the administrative law judge. Any non-defaulting party may move for an order dismissing the case or terminating it adversely to the defaulting party.

Because the Respondent has failed to filed his Prehearing Statement and has not otherwise contacted this tribunal as of the issuance of this Order,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHERMORE ORDERED that Respondent Cease and Desist operating as a Pawnbroker.

IT IS FURTHERMORE ORDERED that Petitioner file a Motion with the Court if they would like to seek sanctions against Respondent.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________________

Ralph King Anderson, III

Administrative Law Judge

March 11, 2008

Columbia, South Carolina


~/pdf/070498.pdf
PDF

Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court