ORDERS:
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
This matter comes before me upon a Motion for Reconsideration filed by the Respondent,
Dorchester County Public Works ("Respondent"). Respondent requests reconsideration of the
March 5, 1999 Order rendered by Administrative Law Judge Alison Renee Lee in the above-captioned case.
Respondent's motion fails to set forth any of the grounds for which a motion for
reconsideration can be granted under ALJD Rule 29(D) and Rule 60(B), SCRCP, which are as
follows:
1. mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;
2. newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);
3. fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party;
4. the judgment is void; or
5. the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application. Based on the foregoing, Respondent's motion is denied.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________________________
Marvin F. Kittrell
Chief Judge
Columbia, South Carolina
April 1, 1999 |