South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Nathan Gamble, Jr. vs. SCDHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Nathan Gamble, Jr.


Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
96-ALJ-07-0173-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER

Nathan Gamble, Jr., resides at Route 2, Box 256, Lake City, South Carolina in Williamsburg County (the "Site"). Mr. Gamble, a South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control ("Department") registered waste tire hauler, collected approximately eight thousand (8,000) tires on the Site.

Findings Of Fact

1. Subsequent to a complaint regarding possible unlawful disposal of waste tires collected from a tire dealer, Department personnel contacted Mr. Nathan Gamble, Jr., by telephone on October 15, 1993. During the conversation, Mr. Gamble revealed that due to financial and logistical considerations, he had been storing approximately eight thousand (8,000) waste tires ("Tires") collected from various tire establishments on his property. Mr. Gamble indicated that when conditions were more favorable, he planned to dispose of the Tires in the appropriate manner, or he would return the Tires to the party from whom they originated.

2. On October 25, 1993, Department personnel sent a letter to Mr. Gamble stating the requirements and conditions that must be met in order to reach compliance with applicable acts and regulations associated with tire handling and disposal. The requirements included a stipulation that the Tires must be removed from Mr. Gamble's property by December 30, 1993. Documentation of proper disposal of the Tires was to be sent to the Department.

3. On January 31, 1994, the Department received a letter from Mr. Gamble detailing a schedule for proper disposal of the Tires located on his property. The stated completion date for final disposal of the Tires was May 15, 1994.

4. In a March 25, 1994 letter from Department personnel, Mr. Gamble was reminded of his failure to comply with the requirements and conditions of the Department's October 25, 1993 letter to Mr. Gamble. Mr. Gamble was further reminded of his obligation under the Waste Tire Regulation, R.61-107.3. Mr. Gamble was given until April 8, 1994, to provide proof of on-going waste tire removal from his property or face the possibility of future enforcement action by the Department.

5. On April 26, 1994, the Department received correspondence from Mr. Gamble, including copies of receipts dated February 28 and March 29, 1994, from Tire Disposal Service for a total of two thousand one hundred ten (2,110) tires.

6. In a June 15, 1994 letter from Department personnel, Mr. Gamble was reminded that he had failed to meet deadlines for documented waste tire removal and disposal as established by himself and the Department. An extended deadline for completion of the waste tire removal and proper disposal was set for July 15, 1994, or Mr. Gamble would face possible enforcement action by the Department. The July 15, 1994, date passed without Mr. Gamble reaching compliance.

7. On October 14, 1994, Mr. Gamble received a Notice of Violation and Enforcement Conference from the Department, which scheduled a conference for October 27, 1994. Mr. Gamble did not attend the conference nor did he request a postponement.

8. During the months following the scheduled Notice of Violation and Enforcement Conference, numerous attempts were made to facilitate proper disposal of the Tires and reach agreement on a Consent Order. Mr. Gamble was unwilling to sustain serious negotiations toward resolution of the issues.

9. On June 17, 1995, Mr. Gamble received a letter from Department personnel informing him that he would be given ten (10) days to resolve the issues addressed in the draft Consent Order or face the possibility of having an administrative order issued without Mr. Gamble's consent.

10. On August 2, 1995, Department personnel visited with Mr. Gamble at the Tire Site. Avenues for achieving compliance were again discussed, as well as the results of a failure to comply.

11. On August 22, 1995, a letter giving ten (10) additional days to resolve the aforementioned compliance issues in the Consent Order was sent to Mr. Gamble via certified mail. That letter came back unclaimed. The same letter was hand-delivered to Mr. Gamble in late September of 1995.

12. On November 14, 1995, Department personnel visited the Tire Site. Mr. Gamble was not present, and Department representatives left a note for Mr. Gamble informing him that the Department would likely move ahead with an Administrative Order after the end of November of 1995 if he failed to resolve the compliance issues.

13. Approximately six thousand (6,000) of the Tires remain on the Site.

14. Administrative Order 95-50-SW was issued to Mr. Gamble on December 20, 1995. Mr. Gamble did not accept certified mail delivery; therefore, the Administrative Order was hand-delivered to Mr. Gamble on March 26. 1996.

15. Department representatives met with Mr. Gamble on May 31, 1996, and discussed a possible settlement. An agreement was reached in principle that Mr. Gamble would be given until July 31, 1996, to chop and dispose of the Tires, in consideration of which the civil penalty would be reduced or suspended entirely. Mr. Gamble has been unable to fulfill the agreement and none of the Tires has been disposed of.

16. Waste Tire Grant Trust Funds are available pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 44-96-120(B)(4) (Supp. 1995) and S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 61-107.1(K) and (L) (Supp. 1995), and can be used to chop and dispose of the Tires on the Site. The Department will conditionally attempt to facilitate disposal of the Tires with Waste Tire Grant Trust Funds. In an effort to resolve the issues in this case, the Department and Mr. Gamble enter into this Consent Order.

Conclusions Of Law

Mr. Nathan Gamble, Jr., engaged in the unlawful collection and disposal of waste tires on an unpermitted site. Thus, Mr. Gamble has violated the following:

1. Pollution Control Act, S. C. Code Ann. § 48-1-90 (a) (Supp. 1995) in that,

"It shall be unlawful for any person directly or indirectly, to throw, drain, run, allow to seep or otherwise discharge into the environment of the State organic or inorganic matter, including sewage, industrial wastes and other wastes, except as in compliance with a permit issued by the Department."


2. Solid Waste Policy and Management Act of 1991, S.C. Code Ann. § 44-96-170 (G)(1) (Supp. 1995) in that,

. . . no person shall maintain a waste tire collection site unless such site is an integral part of the person's permitted waste tire treatment facility or that person has entered into a contract with a permitted waste tire treatment facility for the disposal of waste tires, " and (G)(2), in that,
". . . no person shall knowingly dispose of waste tires in this State," unless the waste tires are disposed of at a permitted site or facility.


3. Waste Tire Regulation, 61-107.3 Section E (1) in that,

't. . . no person shall operate a waste tire collection site, processing facility, or disposal site, unless the site is permitted in accordance with this regulation. "


NOW, THEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that Nathan Gamble, Jr., pursuant to the Pollution Control Act, S.C. Code Ann. § 48-1-50, 48-1-330, and the South Carolina Solid Waste Policy and Management Act, § 44-95-170 (Supp. 1995), shall comply with the following:

1. Immediately, upon the effective date of this fully executed Order, cease all illegal waste tire disposal activities in the State of South Carolina.

2. Prior to any future disposal of solid waste in South Carolina, obtain a permit from the Department to operate a waste disposal facility, or dispose of such waste in an off-site permitted landfill designed for such disposal. Furthermore, Mr. Gamble shall ensure that illegal waste tire disposal activities do not occur on property under his ownership or control.

3. Within thirty (30) days of notification of approval of Waste Tire Grant Funds to remove and dispose of the Tires on the Site, pay the first installment of a civil penalty to the Department of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). In no case shall initial payment be due prior to forty-five (45) days of this fully executed Order. Within sixty (60) days pay a second installment of five hundred dollars ($500.00), and within ninety (90) days pay a final installment of five hundred dollars ($500.00), for a total civil penalty of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00).

Conditioned upon Mr. Gamble's payment in full of the aforementioned civil penalty and upon his compliance with all other requirements of this Order, Administrative Order 95-50-SW shall immediately become null and void. If Waste Tire Grant Trust Funds cannot be secured for the aforementioned tire cleanup, or if Mr. Gamble fails to pay the civil penalty as defined, Administrative Order 95-50-SW shall become effective and be enforceable, subject to appeal of that Order by Mr. Gamble.

IT IS ORDERED that failure to meet deadlines established herein or any other violation of the provisions of this Order shall be deemed a violation of the South Carolina Solid Waste Policy and Management Act of 1991 and the Pollution Control Act and therefore shall be deemed unlawful. Upon ascertaining any such violation, the Department may initiate action to obtain compliance with both this Order and the Acts.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without prejudice.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

RAY N. STEVENS

Administrative Law Judge

This 7th day of August, 1996

Columbia, South Carolina

WE CONSENT:

______________________________

NATHAN GAMBLE, JR.

DATE: August 2, 1996



______________________________

NANCY S. LAYMAN

South Carolina Department of Health and

Environmental Control

DATE: July 31, 1996


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court