South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Saint Eugene Medical Center vs. DHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
Saint Eugene Medical Center

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
04-ALJ-07-0039-CC

APPEARANCES:
Dennis L. Gibbs, Director
Division of Health Licensing

Nancy S. Layman
Chief Attorney for Health Regulation

Donald D. Sandoval, Administrator
Saint Eugene Medical Center

Trudy H. Robertson, Attorney
For Saint Eugene Medical Center
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT


1.On November 6, 2003, the date of the inspection noted herein, McLeod Regional Medical Center of the Pee Dee, Inc. was the holder of a license to operate Saint Eugene Medical Center ("SEMC") issued by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control ("Department") pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 44-7-110 et seq. (Supp. 2003). SEMC, located in Dillon, South Carolina, has a licensed capacity of ninety-two (92) beds.

2.The Department notified SEMC by letter dated January 14, 2004 that it was imposing a $1,500 monetary penalty for violation of S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 61-16, Standards for Licensing Hospitals and Institutional General Infirmaries (Supp. 2003). The Department specifically found a violation of Regulation 61-16, §(607.2)(A), because it determined that out of four (4) records reviewed, three (3) showed that SEMC had provided care and services for newborns who were designated for a higher level hospital. The letter advised that this determination would become final thirty (30) days from the date of this letter unless during such thirty-day (30) period a written letter of appeal requesting a contested case hearing pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 44-7-320(B) (Supp. 2003) and Rules of Procedure for the Administrative Law Judge Division was submitted.

3.By letter dated January 23, 2004, SEMC filed a timely appeal. Prior to proceeding to an administrative hearing, the parties met on February 6, 2004. SEMC presented additional documentation related to the records reviewed by the Department and cited in the Department's letter of January 14, 2004. SEMC continues to contend that it has not violated S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 61-16, Standards for Licensing Hospitals and Institutional General Infirmaries (Supp. 2003). The Department reiterates its original findings of violations of S.C. Code Ann. Regs. 61-16, § 607.2.A.

4.In the interest of resolving this matter without delay and expense of litigation, both SEMC and the Department agree to resolve the matter through this Consent Order.

THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED

1.SEMC has taken and will continue to take action to ensure the violations as cited do not occur.

2.By signing this Consent Order, SEMC neither agrees with nor admits any factual findings or conclusions reached by the Department in its review of the newborn records at issue.

3.SEMC will withdraw its contested case pending before the Administrative Law Judge Division.

4.In consideration of additional documentation furnished by SEMC to the Department and the terms of this Consent Order, the Department agrees to accept $1,000 in payment of the $1,500 total monetary penalty assessed against SEMC.

5.SEMC agrees to submit payment of the $1,000 monetary penalty to the Department. Payment of this $1,000 monetary penalty is to be paid to the Department within thirty (30) days of execution of this Consent Order. Payment is to be by check or money order made payable to the S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control and shall be sent to the following address:

Attention: Earl Bleakley

Division of Health Licensing

S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control

2600 Bull Street

Columbia, S.C. 29201


6.It is understood by SEMC that S.C. Code Ann. § 44-7-320(D)(Supp.2003) states that “Failure to pay a penalty within thirty days is grounds for suspension, revocation, or denial of a renewal of a license. No license may be issued, reissued, or renewed until all penalties finally assessed against a person or facility have been paid.”

7.The Department in no way waives its authority to enforce, by imposing penalties or otherwise, all statutory and regulatory requirements for the licensure of SEMC.

8.SEMC has been informed by the Department that any violations of the regulations or applicable licensing statutes may result in the imposition of penalties or revocation of the license to operate SEMC, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 44-7-320 (Supp. 2003), and the facility administrator has been informed of these potential actions.

9.No additional statements, inducements or promises have been made by either party in consideration for entering into this Consent Order.

10.SEMC understands that this Consent Order governs only the above penalty action and does not affect or purport to affect any other liability, whether civil, criminal, regulatory, or other that may exist as a result of these violations.


AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



May 24, 2004

Carolyn C. MatthewsDate

Administrative Law Judge


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court