South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Max Gysin, William Dobson, and Laurie Dobson vs. DHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Max Gysin, William Dobson, and Laurie Dobson

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
04-ALJ-07-0027-CC

APPEARANCES:
Mary D. Shahid, Counsel for Petitioners

Leslie S. Riley, Counsel for Respondent
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER RESTORING MATTER TO CONTESTED CASE DOCKET AND RESOLVING CONTESTED CASE

This matter is before me by motion and consent of all parties. This contested case arises as a result of an appeal filed by Petitioners of a permit condition imposed by Respondent. Respondent issued P/N #OCRM-03-337-E to Max Gysin on December 15, 2003, authorizing construction of a residence on Lot 6, Northpoint, Harbor Island, in Beaufort County, S. C. However, Respondent included Special Condition #1 (a) in this permit. Special Condition #1 (a) provided that any habitable structure constructed on Lot 6 be no larger than 2400 square feet of heated space. Petitioners’ appeal is based on this special condition.

On April 15, 2004, the parties filed a Consent Order of Dismissal with this Court, dismissing this contested case based on the determination that Petitioners were entitled to a permit amendment authorizing construction of no more than 3,252 square feet of heated space on Lot 6. Under the terms of this Consent Order, Respondent had fourteen days to move to restore this matter to the contested case docket.

On April 29, 2004, Respondent petitioned this Court to restore this contested case. Petitioner filed a Return in Opposition to Motion to Restore.

This Court has been advised that the parties have resolved their differences raised in this appeal, and raised in the Motion to Restore and Return in Opposition. The agreement between the parties is as follows:

1.That this matter shall be restored to the contested case docket.

2.That Lot 32 is in “the general neighborhood” of Lot 6, as contemplated by S. C. Code Reg. 30-15(F)(6)(a)(i). In addition, Lot 32 and Lot 6 are similar based on the location and impact of Respondent’s beachfront jurisdictional line, known as the baseline, on these lots.

3.That based on the best available evidence to both parties, the habitable structure on Lot 32 consists of 2885 square feet of heated space.

4.In accordance with the requirements of S. C. Code Reg. 30-15(F)(6)(a)(i), the maximum size of any habitable structure to be constructed on Lot 6 is 2885 square feet of heated space.

Based on this agreement, it is herby ORDERED:

1.That Docket No. 04-ALJ-07-0027-CC be, and it is hereby, restored to the contested case docket for final disposition herein; and,

2.That Special Condition # 1(a) in P/N #OCRM-03-337-E be, and it is hereby, modified as follows:

1.Provided that the permittee submits final plans for the habitable structure to OCRM for approval before any work takes place at the site. These plans must show the following:

a)That the structure is no larger than 2,885 square feet of heated space, the size of the largest similar structure in the general neighborhood which is also seaward of the baseline.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

The Honorable C. Dukes Scott

Administrative Law Judge


May 20, 2004

Columbia, S. C.


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court