ORDERS:
ORDER OF ABEYANCE
On January 2, 2002, a letter was received from Russell B. Shetterly, Attorney for Respondent, Lucent Technologies, Inc.
(Lucent), requesting that the Court hold this matter in abeyance for four (4) months based upon the grounds that Lucent is
in the process of evaluating whether it intends to construct the facility for which the permits which are the subject of this
proceeding are necessary.
Based on the above, I find that the interest of judicial economy requires that this case be held in abeyance. Accordingly, no
hearing will be held in this case until further order.
However, no later than May 8, 2002, Lucent's Attorney shall notify the Administrative Law Judge Division of the status of
this case. Based on the status, a decision will be made on whether this case shall be set for hearing or otherwise treated in
another manner consistent with the ends of justice.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
RAY N. STEVENS
Administrative Law Judge
This 8th day of January, 2002
Columbia, South Carolina |