South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
City of Anderson vs. SCDHEC

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
City of Anderson

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
00-ALJ-07-0208-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS

This matter is before the Administrative Law Judge Division pursuant to a Motion for Stay filed May 26, 2000, by the City of Anderson and a Motion to Intervene filed June 15, 2000, by the Catawba Riverkeeper. In the interest of promoting judicial economy, the Petitioner, City of Anderson (Anderson) and the Respondent, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) have agreed that this matter should be stayed until pending litigation in the Richland County Court of Common Pleas regarding a challenge to DHEC's 1998 Section 303(d) List involving similar issues--City of Anderson v. DHEC, Docket No. 00-CP-40-1255 (the "Pending Action")--has been finally resolved. The parties agree that a final resolution of the Pending Action will resolve most, if not all, of the issues raised by Anderson's Petition for Administrative Review in this case, which challenges the Section 303(d) List for the year 2000. This Order incorporates the provisions of a proposed Consent Order submitted by the parties.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED and agreed by the parties that the above-referenced matter shall be stayed until the Pending Action is finally resolved. Furthermore, the listing of Lake Secession on the Year 2000 Section 303(d) List as aquatic life use impaired due to phosphorus is stayed until the Pending Action is finally resolved. DHEC may continue to implement the remainder of the Year 2000 Section 303(d) List until and unless this Court orders otherwise.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter shall be stricken from the active docket. After the Pending Action has been resolved, the parties shall so inform this Court so that a determination of the issues remaining for decision, if any, can be made. Upon resolution of the Pending Action, this matter may be restored to the active docket upon the motion of the Petitioner. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Intervene filed by the Catawba Riverkeeper shall be held in abeyance until final resolution of the Pending Action and restoration of this matter to the active docket.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.







_______________________________

Marvin F. Kittrell

Chief Judge



Columbia, South Carolina

July 12, 2000


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court