South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & Regulation

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & Regulation

PARTIES:
Petitioner:
South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & Regulation (Board of Cosmetology)

In Re:
Proposed Regulation
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
96-ALJ-11-0060-RH

APPEARANCES:
John Birgerson, Esquire for Petitioner
 

ORDERS:

ORDER AND DECISION

This matter came before the Administrative Law Judge Division upon the request of the South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation (Board of Cosmetology) for a public hearing dealing with revisions addressing qualifications for licensure of Cosmetology, Estheticians, and Manicurists pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 40-13-80 (Supp. 1995). The Department published the drafting notice of regulations concerning the revisions in the South Carolina State Register, Volume 19, Issue 12 dated December 22, 1995. Thereafter, the proposed regulations were drafted and the request for a public hearing was made.

By Order dated February 2, 1996, a public hearing on the proposed regulations was scheduled for April 15, 1996 at the Administrative Law Judge Division. The Notice of Hearing was published in the South Carolina State Register, Volume 20, Issue 2 dated February 23, 1996. The notice provided the time and place for a public hearing on the proposed regulations. Marvin McMillan of the South Carolina Association of Cosmetology Schools, an association having at least twenty-five members, requested and appeared at the public hearing.

At the public hearing on April 15, 1996, the Department indicated the desire of the Board of Cosmetology to withdraw the proposed regulations. Wanda Hightower, Chairman of the Board of Cosmetology stated that the Board voted to withdraw the proposed regulations. The vote was a result of numerous meetings with members of the industry regarding the regulation from which the Board determined additional study of the issues was needed. Other persons appearing at the hearing concurred in the request to withdraw the regulations.

WHEREAS, Petitioner has withdrawn the proposed regulations and with no objections filed by members of the industry, the regulations are withdrawn and the hearing was dismissed without prejudice.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.









_____________________________

ALISON RENEE LEE

Administrative Law Judge

April ____, 1996

Columbia, South Carolina.


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court