South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
SCDHEC vs. George Burkett and George Burkett, d/b/a B-Quik

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

Respondents:
George Burkett and George Burkett, d/b/a B-Quik
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
06_ALJ-07-0110-CC

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Contested Case

WHEREAS, Petitioner South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (the Department) and Respondents George Burkett and George Burkett, d/b/a B-Quik (collectively Burkett) have agreed to resolve the appeal of the Administrative Order 05-0737-UST;

WHEREAS, the Parties hereby consent to the dismissal of the appeal with prejudice upon the accomplishment of the terms agreed to herein; and,

WHEREAS, in the interest of resolving this matter without the delay and expense of litigation, Burkett agrees to the entry of this Consent Order and agrees that this Consent Order shall be deemed an admission of Fact and Law.

NOW THEREFORE, the Department and Burkett hereby agree that the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order finally resolve all matters regarding the above-referenced Administrative Order and the subsequent reported petroleum release.

Findings of Fact

1.                  Burkett owns and operates underground storage tanks (USTs), UST Permit Number 09425, as defined in the State Underground Petroleum Environmental Response Bank Act, S.C. Code Ann. § 44-2-10 et seq. (2002 and Supp. 2005) and the Underground Storage Tank Control (USTC) Regulations promulgated therefrom. The USTs are located at 460 Spencer Hall Road, Catawba, York County

2.                  On December 29, 1998, the Department was notified of a petroleum release from Burkett’s USTs.

3.                  Subsequent reviews of the Department’s records revealed that Burkett has failed to conduct a Tier I assessment of the release or submit to the Department the corresponding report from such an assessment.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Based upon the above Findings of Fact, the Department reaches the following Conclusions of Law:

1. The Department has authority under the State Underground Storage Petroleum Response Bank (SUPERB) Act, S. C. Code Ann. § 44-2-10 (2002 & Supp. 2005) to issue Orders requiring compliance and to assess civil penalties for violations of the SUPERB Act and the USTC Regulations.

2. The Department has determined that Burkett has violated the following USTC Regulations:

a. 25A S.C. Code Ann. Reg. 61-92.280.65(a) (Supp. 2005), in that Burkett has failed to determine the extent of the petroleum release in accordance with a schedule established by the Department;

b. 25A S.C. Code Ann. Reg. 61-92.280.65(b) (Supp. 2005), in that Burkett failed to submit information on the extent of the petroleum release in accordance with a schedule established by the Department.

3. The SUPERB Act, S. C. Code Ann. § 44-2-140(B) (2002), provides for a civil penalty not to exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) per day of violation for any person violating the Act or any rule, regulation, permit, permit condition, final determination, or Order of the Department.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, with the consent of the Parties that Burkett:

1. Agrees to have an assessment of the site performed by a Department certified site rehabilitation contractor and have an assessment report submitted to the Department on or before October 10, 2006.

2. Agrees to pay the SUPERB deductible of Twenty-Five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) to the Department on or before October 10, 2006. The portion of the deductible that Burkett shall pay may be reduced by the submission of documentation acceptable to the Department showing that Burkett paid for the performance of the following work:

a. Initial Groundwater Assessment – actual cost up to One Thousand, Three Hundred Ninety-five dollars ($1,395.00);

b. Tier I Assessment – actual cost up to Eleven Thousand, Two hundred Thirty dollars ($11,230.00); and

c. Installation of Granulated Activated Charcoal filter(s) – actual cost(s) up to Four Thousand, Three hundred Seventy dollars ($4,370.00).

4. Pursuant to the consent of the Parties, this matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice subject only to enforcement of the terms hereinabove by the Department or upon Petition by the Department to the Administrative Law Court.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

John D. McLeod

Administrative Law Judge

November 7, 2006

WE CONSENT:

___________________________________

Stephen P. Hightower, Esq.

Attorney for Petitioner South Carolina

Department of Health and Environmental

Control

___________________________________

Daniel D. D’Agostino, Esq.

Attorney for Respondents

George Burkett and George Burkett d/b/a B-Quik


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court