South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Max Gysin, William Dobson, and Laurie Dobson vs. DHEC
vs.

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

PARTIES:
Petitioners:
Max Gysin, William Dobson, and Laurie Dobson

Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
04-ALJ-07-0027-CC

APPEARANCES:
Mary D. Shahid, Counsel for
Petitioners Gysin and Dobson

Leslie S. Riley, Counsel for Respondent
SCDHEC-OCRM
 

ORDERS:

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO SCRCP RULE 40(j)

This matter is before me upon Motion of Petitioners and Consent of Respondent for entry of a Consent Order of Dismissal.

This is an appeal of a “Special Permit,” authorizing construction of a habitable structure on Lot 6, Northpoint, Harbor Island, Beaufort County, S. C. Petitioner Gysin submitted an application to Respondent’s Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (“OCRM”) seeking a permit for construction of a house on Lot 6 measuring 3,500 heated square feet. Footnote Petitioner required a “Special Permit” because part of the proposed construction was located seaward of the baseline as it was drawn on plats reflecting Lot 6. OCRM is authorized to issue permits for habitable structures seaward of the baseline in accordance with S. C. Code Sec. 48-39-290.

OCRM issued P/N # OCRM-03-337-E, authorizing construction of a habitable structure but restricting the size of the structure to 2,400 heated square feet. This appeal followed. During the pendency of this appeal Petitioner Gysin entered into a contract to sell Lot 6 to Petitioners William and Laurie Dobson. Petitioner made a Motion seeking to add the Dobsons as parties to this contested case appeal. Respondent has no objection to this Motion. Therefore, I find that William and Laurie Dobson have demonstrated sufficient interest to be added as Co-Petitioners in this matter.

The parties have reached an agreement regarding the matters raised in this appeal. Petitioners have provided Respondent evidence of two structures constructed since 1999 Footnote located seaward of the baseline on Harbor Island. Petitioners agent, Jim Swain, has inspected and measured two houses on beachfront lots impacted by the baseline. These lots are Lot 32 and Lot 36. Mr. Swain has measured the houses on these lots using the method described in an affidavit filed with the Division. Based on his measurements, the structure on Lot 32 consists of 2885 square feet of heated space and the structure on Lot 36 consists of 3252 square feet of heated space. Mr. Swain’s memo documenting these measurements for the Petitioners’ attorney is attached to this Order.

Based on S. C. Code Regs 30-15(F)(6)(a), Special Permits for houses seaward of the baseline can be issued provided that “[t]he house is no larger than similar structures in the general neighborhood and in no case may it be larger than 5000 square feet.” Lots 32 and 36 and the habitable structures constructed on these lots are similar, in accordance with this Regulation, to Lot 6 and any structure constructed on Lot 6. All three lots are impacted by the baseline. In the case of each lot, the construction of a house necessitates a Special Permit.

Therefore, the parties have agreed that Gysin is entitled to a modification of the issued permit to authorize the construction of no more than 3,252 square feet of heated space. In addition, the parties have agreed that Gysin, or his successors in title, shall submit an as-built survey at the conclusion of construction of the habitable structure on Lot 6 that provides evidence of the total amount of heated space.

It is further agreed between the parties that OCRM waives the one year time period for restoration of a case as is provided in SCRCP Rule 40(j). Instead, OCRM has fourteen (14) days from the date of execution and filing of this Order to move to restore this matter. Both parties agree that the only basis upon which this matter may be restored to the Division’s docket is a determination by OCRM that Mr. Swain’s measurements of the structures located on Lots 32 and 36 are inaccurate. For the purposes of interpretation of this agreement, inaccuracy means that the measurements provided by Mr. Swain are larger than measurements obtained by OCRM. Additionally, all parties agree that on-site inspection and measurement of the structures located on these lots is the most accurate method of determining the size on any structures located on these lots. OCRM’s determination of inaccuracy shall be exclusively based on an on-site inspection. Failure to move to restore this matter within fourteen (14) days of execution and filing of this Order shall result in a waiver by OCRM of any challenge to the measurements provided by Mr. Swain.

Petitioners waive the ten (10) day notice provision as set forth in SCRCP Rule 40(j).

Therefore, based on the consent of the parties as evidenced by their signatures below, it is, herby, ORDERED, that P/N # OCRM-03-337-E is hereby modified to authorize construction of a habitable structure on Lot 6, Northpoint, Harbor Island, so long as the maximum heated space of this structure does not exceed 3,252 square feet, and provided that the permittee or his successors in title submit to OCRM documentation of the size of the completed structure at the conclusion of construction.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.


________________________________

The Honorable C. Dukes Scott

Administrative Law Judge

April 15, 2004

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court