South Carolina              
Administrative Law Court
Edgar A. Brown building 1205 Pendleton St., Suite 224 Columbia, SC 29201 Voice: (803) 734-0550

SC Administrative Law Court Decisions

CAPTION:
Vanessa Woods, Case No. 21 - Day Care vs. SCDSS

AGENCY:
South Carolina Department of Social Services

PARTIES:
Petitioner/Appellant:
Vanessa Woods, Case No. 21 - Day Care

Respondents:
South Carolina Department of Social Services
 
DOCKET NUMBER:
96-ALJ-18-0057-AP

APPEARANCES:
n/a
 

ORDERS:

STAY ORDER

A motion hearing was held via teleconference in the above matter on February 12, 1996, at 9:00 a.m. with Thomas A. Boland, Sr., Attorney for Respondent, and Timothy E. Meacham, Attorney for Appellant. Arguments were heard as to whether the final agency action in this case should be stayed pending the outcome of this appeal. By final Administrative Decision issued January 2, 1996, the South Carolina Department of Social Services (hereinafter referred to as "DSS") revoked the group daycare license of Vanessa Woods.

Appellant Woods filed a Notice of Appeal of the decision of DSS with the Administrative Law Judge Division on January 30, 1996, pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. §§ 20-7-2760 and

1-23-380 (Supp. 1995). Appellant also moved for a stay of the DSS decision. DSS moved to lift the stay. Pursuant to ALJD Rule 34, the DSS decision is automatically stayed, absent specific statutory authority to the contrary in Title 20.

Upon hearing oral arguments from counsel and reviewing the facts and applicable law,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the DSS decision to revoke the group daycare license of Appellant Vanessa Woods is automatically stayed pending the consideration and decision by this Court of the appeal in this matter.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that DSS shall continue to exercise its regulatory authority over the operation of Ms. Wood's group daycare center and shall make periodic inspections of the daycare center to assure regulatory and statutory compliance. Ms. Woods is ordered to comply with all of the regulatory and statutory requirements associated with the group daycare license

and to allow DSS inspection without hinderance. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Order shall be deemed a contemptuous act and shall subject the party to sanctions by this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with ALJD Rules 33-39 regarding matters heard on appeal by the ALJD. A hearing to allow counsel to present oral arguments shall be scheduled as expeditiously as possible.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



_______________________________

STEPHEN P. BATES

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

February 12, 1996

Columbia, South Carolina


Brown Bldg.

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2024 South Carolina Administrative Law Court